In a phase 2 clinical trial, patients with stage I-III KRAS-mutated PDAC recently (<6 months) cleared by standard therapy were treated with either camupepimut (a lymph-node targeting, CpG-adjuvanted vaccine targeting KRAS G12D and G12R neoantigens; n=96) or standard-of-care/observation (n=48). DFS lasted a median of 23.8 versus 21.2 months, which did not meet the primary endpoint, but an improved 6-month DFS rate of 75.7% vs. 61.7% was significantly associated with treatment. In camupepimut-treated patients, mKRAS-specific T cell responses above 9.17-fold over baseline correlated with improved DFS (NR vs. 6.08 months), with evidence of epitope spreading.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: Camupepimut (ELI-002 7P) drives mutated KRAS (mKRAS)-specific T cell responses that correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mKRAS pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the phase 1 AMPLIFY-201 trial. In the phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial, patients with stage I-III KRAS-mutated PDAC without recurrence within 6 months of standard therapy were randomized 2:1 to camupepimut (n = 96) or standard-of-care/observation (n = 48). Stratification balanced nodal status. The primary DFS endpoint was not met (median 23.8 versus 21.2 months; HR 0.85, P = 0.5329). However, prespecified and exploratory analyses were informative. A numerical DFS advantage at 6 months of 14.0% (75.7% versus 61.7%; HR 0.55, P = 0.0557) corresponded to camupepimut dosing. Post hoc multivariate Cox regression analysis of DFS indicated an improved outcome for camupepimut (adjusted HR 0.47, P = 0.0086), a worse outcome for stage III disease (adjusted HR 2.29, P = 0.0127), an elevated baseline CA19-9 (adjusted HR 3.16, P < 0.0001) and baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) positivity (adjusted HR 5.99, P < 0.0001). Prespecified subgroup analyses addressing prognostic and predictive factors suggested DFS benefit for camupepimut (ctDNA negative: HR 0.51, P = 0.0280; no prior radiation: HR 0.59, P = 0.0221). Exploratory analysis demonstrated that ex vivo mKRAS-specific T cell responses were robust (98.9%, 89/90) and associated with antigen spreading (86.7%, 13/15). In camupepimut-treated patients, mKRAS-specific T cell response >9.17-fold over baseline (82.2%, 74/90) correlated with improved DFS (HR 0.22, P < 0.0001), with the median DFS not reached versus 6.08 months for above and below 9.17-fold, respectively. Camupepimut safety was similar to observation, with grade ≥3 adverse events in 10.4% (10/96) versus 14.6% (7/48), and few serious AEs (6.3%, 6/96 versus 8.3%, 4/48; reflecting progression/surgical complication). These efficacy and immunogenicity signals will inform a refined strategy for a confirmatory phase 3 trial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05726864 .

Author Info: (1) Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. george.ben@mayo.edu. Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA. george.ben@mayo.edu. (2) Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (3) Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, USA. (4) City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. (5) Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. (6) Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (7) Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. (8) University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA. (9) Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. (10) Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Health, Nashville, TN, USA. (11) Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. (12) City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (13) University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. (14) Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. (15) University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. (16) Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (17) University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (18) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. (19) UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. (20) Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA. (21) Lehigh Valley Topper Cancer Institute, Jefferson Health, Allentown, PA, USA. (22) Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, NMDP, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (23) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (24) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (25) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (26) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (27) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (28) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (29) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (30) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (31) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (32) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. (33) Elicio Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA. chris.haqq@elicio.com. (34) University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (35) University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (36) Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. oreillye@mskcc.org.