Journal Articles

Cancers modulate processing and presentation of p53 neoantigens to evade T cell detection Spotlight 

Haratani et al. found that most neoantigens arising from truncal mutations in TP53 were not presented, either because they arose from processing-resistant regions of p53 or because the required HLA allele was absent. Presentable antigens that were immunologically distinct could also be masked in tumors via increased activity of the aminopeptidase ERAP1, which prevented the display of a high-affinity HLA-A*02:01 complex containing a strongly immunogenic 11-mer. Instead, tumors favored the display of low-affinity complexes with a poorly immunogenic 9-mer, resulting in only weak T cell-mediated antitumor immunity, despite high-quality TCRs.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Haratani et al. found that most neoantigens arising from truncal mutations in TP53 were not presented, either because they arose from processing-resistant regions of p53 or because the required HLA allele was absent. Presentable antigens that were immunologically distinct could also be masked in tumors via increased activity of the aminopeptidase ERAP1, which prevented the display of a high-affinity HLA-A*02:01 complex containing a strongly immunogenic 11-mer. Instead, tumors favored the display of low-affinity complexes with a poorly immunogenic 9-mer, resulting in only weak T cell-mediated antitumor immunity, despite high-quality TCRs.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: TP53 mutations occur early in malignant transformation as truncal events in tumor evolution and are therefore generally present in all descendant tumor cells, creating an immunological vulnerability. Here, we examined the immunogenicity and antigenicity of p53 neoantigens emerging from these truncal mutations. Comprehensive immunopeptidomics revealed that hotspot mutations in human tumors preferentially localize to p53 regions resistant to antigen processing, thereby avoiding display altogether. Moreover, for neoantigens presentable by HLA-A∗02:01 or HLA-B∗07:02 and structurally divergent from corresponding wild-type p53 peptide-HLA complexes, clinical tumors commonly lacked the relevant presenting HLA allele. Tumor cells further resisted T cell killing through increased activity of the aminopeptidase ERAP1, preventing display of high-affinity HLA-A∗02:01 complexes containing an immunogenic p53I195F-derived 11-mer, or by expressing low-affinity HLA-A∗02:01 complexes containing a p53R175H-derived 9-mer with poor antigenicity despite high-quality human TCRs. These findings define mechanisms by which tumors restrict targetable truncal neoantigen display and suggest immunopeptidome shift strategies to circumvent immune escape.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (2) Department of Medical Oncolo

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (2) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Laboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (3) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Laboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (4) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (5) Structural Biology Center, X-ray Science Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439, USA. (6) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Laboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (7) Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (8) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (9) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (10) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. (11) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. (12) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. (13) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. (14) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (15) Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (16) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (17) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (18) Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (19) Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (20) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (21) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (22) Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (23) Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy; Division of Hematopathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. (24) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. (25) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: david_barbie@dfci.harvard.edu. (26) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ellis_reinherz@dfci.harvard.edu.

Reprogramming engineered autologous T cells to overcome resistance in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma Spotlight 

Asano, Veatch, and Sung et al. identified TCRMCC1, a high-avidity HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR targeting Merkel cell polyomavirus large-T antigen and treated seven patients who had ICI-refractory metastatic MCC using autologous TCRMCC1-transduced T cells plus ICB. TTCR-MCC1 cells trafficked to tumors and induced regression in two patients, but HLA class I silencing limited activity. In one patient, delayed regression coincided with endogenous effector T cell activation and restored tumor HLA expression. TTCR-MCC1 cells armored with CD8αβ and a CD200R-CD28 switch receptor showed enhanced tumor infiltration, HLA expression, and control of HLA-low MCC in vivo.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Asano, Veatch, and Sung et al. identified TCRMCC1, a high-avidity HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR targeting Merkel cell polyomavirus large-T antigen and treated seven patients who had ICI-refractory metastatic MCC using autologous TCRMCC1-transduced T cells plus ICB. TTCR-MCC1 cells trafficked to tumors and induced regression in two patients, but HLA class I silencing limited activity. In one patient, delayed regression coincided with endogenous effector T cell activation and restored tumor HLA expression. TTCR-MCC1 cells armored with CD8αβ and a CD200R-CD28 switch receptor showed enhanced tumor infiltration, HLA expression, and control of HLA-low MCC in vivo.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) outcomes, but most patients with MCC develop resistance. We identified T cell receptor (TCR)MCC1, a highly avid, HLA-A*02:01-restricted TCR targeting the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) oncoprotein large-T antigen15-23. Seven patients with ICI-refractory metastatic MCPyV+ MCC received TCRMCC1-transduced cells (TTCR-MCC1 cells) after lymphodepleting chemotherapy or HLA-enhancing interventions [radiation or interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune)], with concurrent ICIs (NCT03747484). TTCR-MCC1 cells trafficked to tumor sites and expressed a gene expression profile compatible with T cell activation, with tumor regression observed in two patients. However, therapeutic activity was limited by HLA class I silencing, a common mechanism of immune escape in MCC. In one patient, delayed tumor regression coincided with endogenous effector immune activation and restoration of MCC HLA expression, implying that robust local responses could reverse HLA silencing. To overcome this barrier, we engineered CD4 and CD8 TTCR-MCC1 cells to coexpress CD8αβ and a CD200R-CD28 switch receptor, enabling CD4 T cell engagement and T cell costimulation. These modifications enhanced tumor infiltration, increased HLA expression, and improved control of HLAlow MCC in vivo in mice. These findings support the feasibility of TCR-engineered cell therapy for MCPyV+ MCC and provide a blueprint for overcoming immune evasion via targeted localized enhancement of antigen presentation.

Author Info: (1) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (2) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Can

Author Info: (1) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (2) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (3) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (4) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (5) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (6) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (7) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (8) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (9) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (10) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (11) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (12) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (13) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (14) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (15) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (16) Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (17) Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (18) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (19) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (20) Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorders Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. (21) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (22) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (23) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (24) Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. (25) Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (26) Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (27) Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (28) Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (29) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. (30) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Department of Immunology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA. (31) Biomedical Data Science Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland. University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. School of Life Sciences, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. (32) Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorders Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. (33) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Department of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. (34) Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

γδ T cells modulate anti-tumor immunity in small cell lung cancer

Spotlight 

Using scRNA sequencing, Ng et al. compared LN biopsy samples (non-affected vs. tumor-affected) from SCLC patients to study the antitumor role of MHC-I-independent pathways. Despite being PD-1+, γδ T cells were cytotoxic, infiltrated patient samples, and predicted better outcomes with anti-PD-L1 in patients with high levels of γδ T cells. In preclinical models, γδ T cells were as effective as CD8+ T cells in tarlatamab (DLL3–CD3 BiTE)-redirected SCLC killing, while zoledronate sensitized SCLC cells to Vδ2+ T cell-mediated killing and promoted spontaneous γδ T cell-mediated MHC-I-independent SCLC killing that required BTN2A1.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

Using scRNA sequencing, Ng et al. compared LN biopsy samples (non-affected vs. tumor-affected) from SCLC patients to study the antitumor role of MHC-I-independent pathways. Despite being PD-1+, γδ T cells were cytotoxic, infiltrated patient samples, and predicted better outcomes with anti-PD-L1 in patients with high levels of γδ T cells. In preclinical models, γδ T cells were as effective as CD8+ T cells in tarlatamab (DLL3–CD3 BiTE)-redirected SCLC killing, while zoledronate sensitized SCLC cells to Vδ2+ T cell-mediated killing and promoted spontaneous γδ T cell-mediated MHC-I-independent SCLC killing that required BTN2A1.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm with limited sensitivity to anti-PD-(L)1 blockade, which is likely caused by the epigenetic silencing of MHC-I. Elucidating MHC-I-independent immune recognition mechanisms is therefore crucial for enhancing treatment responses and improving clinical outcomes in a greater number of patients. Leveraging single-cell approaches, we discovered γδ T cell infiltration in biospecimens from patients with SCLC. Despite PD-1 expression, γδ T cells maintained a cytotoxic transcriptional profile, suggesting an anti-tumor role. Indeed, high γδ T cell infiltration in two practice-changing clinical trials predicted improved response to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in patients with SCLC. Moreover, using preclinical models, we demonstrated that γδ T cells are effective at tarlatamab (delta-like ligand 3 [DLL3]-CD3 bispecific T cell engager [BiTE])-redirected SCLC killing and that zoledronate, an FDA-approved compound, can sensitize SCLC cells to γδ T cell-mediated killing. Thus, our findings suggest that engaged γδ T cells are potentially valuable targets for SCLC therapy.

Author Info: (1) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The Univers

Author Info: (1) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Electronic address: ng.ji@wehi.edu.au. (2) Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Genetics and Gene Regulation Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (3) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. (4) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. (5) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. (6) Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. (7) Department of Translational Genomics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University of Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany. (8) Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Blood Cells and Blood Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (9) Clinical Translation, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; School of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. (10) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. (11) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. (12) Centre for Inflammation Biology and Cancer Immunology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. (13) Collaborative Centre for Genomic Cancer Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. (14) WEHI Advanced Genomics Facility and Single Cell Open Research Endeavour (SCORE), Advanced Technology and Biology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (15) WEHI Advanced Genomics Facility and Single Cell Open Research Endeavour (SCORE), Advanced Technology and Biology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (16) Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (17) WEHI Advanced Genomics Facility and Single Cell Open Research Endeavour (SCORE), Advanced Technology and Biology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (18) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (19) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. (20) Department of Translational Genomics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany. (21) Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Genetics and Gene Regulation Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (22) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. (23) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. (24) Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Genetics and Gene Regulation Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. (25) Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia. (26) ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Electronic address: sutherland.k@wehi.edu.au.

Messenger RNA delivery of a dual CD25/CD122 affinity-tuned IL-2 variant prolongs exposure and potentiates antitumor T cell immunity Featured  

Vormehr et al. engineered an IL-2 variant with high affinity for IL-2Rβ and low affinity for IL-2Rα delivered as mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. Treatment of murine models showed expansion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells with no impact on Tregs. Treatment worked synergistically with ICB and vaccination. The safety of clinically relevant doses was demonstrated in non-human primates.

Vormehr et al. engineered an IL-2 variant with high affinity for IL-2Rβ and low affinity for IL-2Rα delivered as mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. Treatment of murine models showed expansion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells with no impact on Tregs. Treatment worked synergistically with ICB and vaccination. The safety of clinically relevant doses was demonstrated in non-human primates.

ABSTRACT: The therapeutic potential of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in cancer treatment is limited by toxicity challenges, partly due to an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile and unintended activation of regulatory T (T(reg)) cells alongside the desired activation of CD8(+) effector T cells. To selectively stimulate CD8(+) T cells over T(reg) cells, we engineered an IL-2 variant (IL-2var) with a dual-tuned affinity profile that features reduced binding to IL-2R_ (CD25) and enhanced binding to IL-2R_ (CD122). To optimize its pharmacokinetics and facilitate tumor enrichment, the variant is fused to albumin and delivered as an mRNA encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle (Alb-IL-2var RNA-LNP), enabling sustained systemic exposure from hepatic production upon intravenous administration. We show that Alb-IL-2var has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and is tolerated at biologically active doses in immunocompetent mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Selective enhancement of CD8(+) T cell responses over T(reg) cells is demonstrated in vitro in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in vivo in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. When combined with an mRNA cancer vaccine in syngeneic subcutaneous mouse tumor models, Alb-IL-2var RNA-LNP stimulates the expansion of tumor-infiltrating and circulating tumor antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells, but not T(reg) cells. In advanced and cold syngeneic tumor models, it enhances the efficacy of radiotherapy, checkpoint inhibitors, and cancer vaccines. Combination with checkpoint inhibitors and vaccine induces profound proinflammatory conversion of cold tumors. These preclinical results validate a rational design approach to overcome the limitations of IL-2 therapy and support the clinical evaluation of Alb-IL-2var RNA-LNP for solid cancers.

Author Info: (1) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (2) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (3) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (4) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (5) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (6) BioNTech SE

Author Info: (1) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (2) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (3) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (4) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (5) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (6) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (7) TRON gGmbH - Translational Oncology at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. (8) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (9) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. (10) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany. HI-TRON - Helmholtz Institute for Translational Oncology Mainz (HI-TRON Mainz) of the DKFZ, Mainz, Germany. (11) BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany.

Intratumoral injection of EpCAM BITE, IL-12, and GM-CSF mRNA-LNPs blocks the growth of local treated and distant untreated tumors Spotlight 

Golubovskaya et al. showed that intratumoral delivery of an anti-human EpCAM-CD3 BiTE mRNA-LNP stops growth of only directly injected EpCAM+ human tumor xenografts in immuno-incompetent mice (with i.v. human T cells). When added to the BiTE-LNPs, IL-12+GM-CSF led to control of both injected and distal tumors. Combined treatment increased the expansion of injected human T cells, expression of T cell cytolysis pathway genes, and HLA class II- and APC-associated gene expression in tumors. In blood, GM-CSF, IL-12, and the BiTE peaked between 4 and 72 hrs post-delivery, and were minimally expressed in normal tissues.

Contributed by Paula Hochman

Golubovskaya et al. showed that intratumoral delivery of an anti-human EpCAM-CD3 BiTE mRNA-LNP stops growth of only directly injected EpCAM+ human tumor xenografts in immuno-incompetent mice (with i.v. human T cells). When added to the BiTE-LNPs, IL-12+GM-CSF led to control of both injected and distal tumors. Combined treatment increased the expansion of injected human T cells, expression of T cell cytolysis pathway genes, and HLA class II- and APC-associated gene expression in tumors. In blood, GM-CSF, IL-12, and the BiTE peaked between 4 and 72 hrs post-delivery, and were minimally expressed in normal tissues.

Contributed by Paula Hochman

ABSTRACT: We have previously shown that a T cell engaging bispecific humanized anti-human EpCAM-CD3 antibody efficiently kills a human EpCAM positive human xenograft in an NSG partially humanized mouse injected intravenously with human T cells when the anti-EpCAM-CD3 was delivered intratumorally as an mRNA-LNP. To extend these results we tested the effects of combining the anti-human EpCAM-CD3 with various cytokines injected into a tumor on the left side of NSG mice and an uninjected tumor on the right side of the mice. Combining both IL-12 and GM-CSF with anti-EpCAM-CD3 increased the number of T cells and the expression of genes and pathways that mediated T cell-based killing in the neighborhood of both the injected and the uninjected tumor and substantial increases in the expression of HLA Class II and associated genes in both tumors. This turned the cancer cells into potentially antigen-presenting cells. The effect of combining intratumoral injection of anti-EpCAM-CD3 with cytokines IL-12 and GM-CSF on tumor growth distal to the injection site avoids serious side effects on normal tissue, and suggests this technology offers a major approach to immunotherapy for treatment of a wide range of cancers from early to severe late stages.

Author Info: (1) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564. (2) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564. (3) Promab Biotechnologies

Author Info: (1) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564. (2) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564. (3) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. (4) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. (5) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. (6) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. (7) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. (8) IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564. (9) Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom. ROR: https://ror.org/052gg0110 (10) Promab Biotechnologies, Richmond, CA 94564. IntraAb, Richmond, CA 94564.

Dendritic cell centric nanoengineering couples antigen acquisition and STING activation for cancer immunotherapy Spotlight 

Xiang et al. developed a DC-directed dual pH-gated hybrid nanoparticle (HNP) that sequentially releases αCD47 peptides in the acidic TIME to enhance antigen acquisition and subsequently cGAMP under endosomal acidification to activate intracellular STING. HNP enhanced cDC1 cross-presentation and CD8+ T cell priming, forming CXCL9-enriched cDC1 niches with increased local CD8+ T cell accumulation. HNP suppressed MC38 tumor growth and orthotopic 4T1 metastasis through Batf3-dependent cDC1s and CD8+ T cells, but not macrophages. It also enhanced human DC T cell priming and antitumor activity in a CD34+ humanized xenograft model.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Xiang et al. developed a DC-directed dual pH-gated hybrid nanoparticle (HNP) that sequentially releases αCD47 peptides in the acidic TIME to enhance antigen acquisition and subsequently cGAMP under endosomal acidification to activate intracellular STING. HNP enhanced cDC1 cross-presentation and CD8+ T cell priming, forming CXCL9-enriched cDC1 niches with increased local CD8+ T cell accumulation. HNP suppressed MC38 tumor growth and orthotopic 4T1 metastasis through Batf3-dependent cDC1s and CD8+ T cells, but not macrophages. It also enhanced human DC T cell priming and antitumor activity in a CD34+ humanized xenograft model.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists have shown limited antitumor efficacy, in part because STING activation is not preferentially focused on dendritic cells (DCs), which specialize in cross-priming. We present a DC-centric strategy that synergistically licenses DCs by coordinating CD47-SIRP_ checkpoint relief and STING activation via dual ultra-pH-sensitive gating. Mild tumor acidity first unmasks the _CD47 cue to prime antigen acquisition. Following DC-biased uptake, a second acidic gate releases cGAMP to engage STING in antigen-bearing DCs. Functionally, efficacy requires Batf3-dependent cDC1s and CD8(+) T cells, yet is preserved after macrophage depletion. In murine models, this strategy suppresses tumor growth and metastasis with good tolerability, and it retains activity in a humanized cell-line-derived xenograft model established in NSG-SGM3 hosts, supporting activity in a partially reconstituted human immune setting. Together, this work presents a mechanism-guided combination strategy to optimize STING agonist therapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009

Author Info: (1) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (2) School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. (3) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (4) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. (5) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. (6) Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology/Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin 300100, China. (7) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (8) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (9) State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, 306 Huiren Road, Tianjin 300301, P.R. China. (10) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (11) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. (12) School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. Electronic address: renxiubao@tjmuch.com. (13) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. Electronic address: wsong@tmu.edu.cn. (14) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China. Electronic address: qintingting@tjmuch.com. (15) Department of Pharmaceutics, Jiang Su Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Optimization, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China. Electronic address: suxin.li@cpu.edu.cn. (16) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China; Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300100, China. Electronic address: jianwang03@tmu.edu.cn.

Breast cancer prevention by prophylactic Lalba mRNA-LNP vaccination Spotlight 

Nishida et al. sought to prevent carcinogen (NMU)-induced mammary tumorigenesis in outbred Sprague-Dawley rats by targeting LALBA, a protein specifically expressed in luminal progenitor (LP) cells – the proposed cell-of-origin for breast cancer. Vaccination with N1-methylpseudouridine-modified Lalba mRNA-LNP induced antigen-specific immune responses, suppressed tumor incidence or progression, and extended tumor-free and overall survival. scRNAseq revealed a reduced frequency of proliferative LP cells upon vaccination, suggesting effective targeting of immunoreactive early mammary epithelial lesions.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

Nishida et al. sought to prevent carcinogen (NMU)-induced mammary tumorigenesis in outbred Sprague-Dawley rats by targeting LALBA, a protein specifically expressed in luminal progenitor (LP) cells – the proposed cell-of-origin for breast cancer. Vaccination with N1-methylpseudouridine-modified Lalba mRNA-LNP induced antigen-specific immune responses, suppressed tumor incidence or progression, and extended tumor-free and overall survival. scRNAseq revealed a reduced frequency of proliferative LP cells upon vaccination, suggesting effective targeting of immunoreactive early mammary epithelial lesions.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

ABSTRACT: Tumor-suppressive immunity is more evident in early-stage compared to advanced tumors making it the ideal point for cancer interceptive immunotherapies. We previously described that higher peripheral T cell diversity is associated with more pronounced CD8(+) T cell infiltration in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, implying a close interaction between peripheral and intratumor immunity. Here, we developed lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines expressing the alpha-lactalbumin (LALBA) protein unique to mammary luminal progenitors (LPs) to test whether enhancing immune response by prophylactic vaccination against the putative cell-of-origin of breast cancer suppresses tumorigenesis. Vaccination of outbred Sprague-Dawley rats with N1-methylpseudouridine-modified or unmodified Lalba mRNA-LNP induced different degrees of LALBA-specific and nonspecific immune responses. The vaccination suppressed carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis and improved tumor-free and overall survival without obvious toxicity in the normal mammary glands and other organs. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed that vaccination decreases the frequency of a proliferative LP population in immunoreactive early epithelial hyperplasia. Overall, we provide proof of principle that prophylactic Lalba mRNA-LNP has the potential to suppress the initiation and progression of early breast neoplastic lesions.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (2) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (3) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (4) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (5) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (6) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (7) Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. ROR: https://ror.org/00b30xv10 (8) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (9) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (10) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94 (11) Acuitas Therapeutics, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. (12) Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. ROR: https://ror.org/00b30xv10 (13) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. ROR: https://ror.org/02jzgtq86 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. ROR: https://ror.org/04b6nzv94

Neutrophil-integrated syncytial CAR macrophage for cancer immunotherapy Spotlight 

Tian et al. fused second-generation CAR-macrophages with neutrophils, generating syncytial (S)-CAR-M with enhanced chemokine-driven solid tumor infiltration and cytotoxicity. S-CAR-Ms increased antigen presentation, generated NETs, and released ROS, killing tumor cells and enhancing phagocytosis of tumor cell debris through both scFv–antigen and PtdSer–MerTK pathways. In mice, S-CAR-Ms eliminated primary tumors and metastases, induced epitope spreading that reduced target-antigen-low cell escape, prevented recurrence, and improved survival. S-CAR-Ms also synergized with both radiotherapy and surgical resection.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Tian et al. fused second-generation CAR-macrophages with neutrophils, generating syncytial (S)-CAR-M with enhanced chemokine-driven solid tumor infiltration and cytotoxicity. S-CAR-Ms increased antigen presentation, generated NETs, and released ROS, killing tumor cells and enhancing phagocytosis of tumor cell debris through both scFv–antigen and PtdSer–MerTK pathways. In mice, S-CAR-Ms eliminated primary tumors and metastases, induced epitope spreading that reduced target-antigen-low cell escape, prevented recurrence, and improved survival. S-CAR-Ms also synergized with both radiotherapy and surgical resection.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: The limited effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor macrophage (CAR-M) therapy is largely due to poor tumor infiltration, reduced effector function and immune escape of target antigen-low tumors. Here we developed syncytial CAR-Ms (S-CAR-M) by fusing CAR-Ms with neutrophils. S-CAR-Ms accumulated in tumors more than conventional CAR-Ms because of chemokine-driven migration. By releasing neutrophil extracellular traps and reactive oxygen species inherited from neutrophils, S-CAR-Ms increased PtdSer exposure on tumor cells, leading to efficient phagocytosis of tumor debris through both the scFv-antigen and PtdSer-MerTK pathways. Thus, a single dose of S-CAR-Ms can reduce tumor burden, limit metastasis and prevent tumor recurrence in syngeneic and xenograft mouse models. Additionally, S-CAR-M therapy triggered antigen spreading, minimizing escape by target antigen-low tumor cells. S-CAR-Ms overcome limitations of conventional CAR-Ms toward solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (2) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Chi

Author Info: (1) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (2) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (3) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (4) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (5) Clinical Center for Biotherapy, Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine of Abdominal Tumor of Fujian Province, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. (6) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (7) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (8) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (9) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (10) Department of Pharmacy, Liyuan Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. (11) Clinical Center for Biotherapy, Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine of Abdominal Tumor of Fujian Province, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. (12) Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine of Abdominal Tumor of Fujian Province, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. Central Laboratory, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. (13) Clinical Center for Biotherapy, Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. niu.boning@zsxmhospital.com. Clinical Research Center for Precision Medicine of Abdominal Tumor of Fujian Province, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. niu.boning@zsxmhospital.com. Central Laboratory, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China. niu.boning@zsxmhospital.com. (14) Tongji School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. zhipingzhang@hust.edu.cn. National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. zhipingzhang@hust.edu.cn. Hubei Engineering Research Centre for Novel Drug Delivery System, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. zhipingzhang@hust.edu.cn.

Immune checkpoint blockade facilitates primary tumor rejection in a cDC1-independent manner without immunological memory acquisition

Spotlight 

Arisato et al. found that the LLC-2B2 subclone of LLC was universally rejected in ICB-treated WT mice and was also rejected in 36% of ICB-treated Batf3-/- mice. In Batf3-/- mice, rejection was dependent on CD8+ T cells primed by alternative XCR1- APCs, which upregulated costimulatory CD80, CD86, and CD40 in response to soluble factors secreted by LLC-2B2 cells. However, when mice that had cleared LLC-2B2 tumors were rechallenged, all WT mice rejected tumors, while most Batf3-/- mice did not, suggesting that cDC1s were important in establishing protective immune memory. Intratumoral injection of Flt3L-DCs restored protection from rechallenge.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Arisato et al. found that the LLC-2B2 subclone of LLC was universally rejected in ICB-treated WT mice and was also rejected in 36% of ICB-treated Batf3-/- mice. In Batf3-/- mice, rejection was dependent on CD8+ T cells primed by alternative XCR1- APCs, which upregulated costimulatory CD80, CD86, and CD40 in response to soluble factors secreted by LLC-2B2 cells. However, when mice that had cleared LLC-2B2 tumors were rechallenged, all WT mice rejected tumors, while most Batf3-/- mice did not, suggesting that cDC1s were important in establishing protective immune memory. Intratumoral injection of Flt3L-DCs restored protection from rechallenge.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) provides durable therapeutic responses across multiple cancer types. Although crosstalk between T cells and conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) is essential, the contribution of other antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to ICB-induced tumor rejection remains unclear. To address this, we show that while the majority of wild type (WT) mice rejected an immunogenic clone of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) following ICB, 35.7% of Batf3–/– mice, which lack the cDC1 subset, also rejected this LLC clone. ICB induced the upregulation of costimulatory markers on XCR1– APCs in the tumors and lymph nodes of Batf3–/– mice, similar to responses observed in wild-type mice. Mechanistically, conditioned culture media from LLC, but not from ICB-resistant B16F10 melanoma cells, stimulated bone marrow-derived cDC1s and cDC2s, as evidenced by the upregulation of CD40 and CD80 expression. RNA sequencing revealed that antitumor immunity-related genes were upregulated in LLC cells compared with B16F10 cells. To determine the role of cDC1-independent long-term immune memory, we rechallenged ICB-induced tumor-free mice with LLC tumors. We found that, without supplementation of cDC1s during primary rejection, Batf3–/– mice failed to spontaneously reject the rechallenged tumors. These findings demonstrate that ICB can elicit primary antitumor T cell responses against immunogenic tumors in the absence of cDC1s, whereas cDC1s are essential for the establishment of ICB-induced long-term memory. Our study underscores the importance of clinical strategies targeting both cDC1-dependent and cDC1-independent pathways to enhance the durable efficacy of ICB.

Author Info: 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medici

Author Info: 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Shinshu Cancer Center, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan 4. Division of Molecular Psychoimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan 6. Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan 7. Quantum immunology Team, Institute for Quantum Life science, National Institute for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan 8. Division of Molecular Neuroimmunology, Department of Homeostatic Regulation, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Aichi, Japan 9. Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan

Enfortumab vedotin induces immunogenic cell death and shows enhanced preclinical antitumor activity when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor Featured  

Untangling the mechanism of enfortumab vedotin – an antibody–drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4 on cancer cells – Olson and Liu et al. showed that upon target binding, the drug is imported into the cell and transported to the lysosome, where MMAE is released, inducing direct cytotoxicity by disrupting microtubule formation and inducing ER stress and immunogenic cell death (ICD). Upon ICD, MMAE is released from the cell, killing nearby bystander cells. ICD also induces macrophage and DC activation, initiating protective antitumor immunity against both Nectin-4+ and Nectin-4- tumor cells. Enfortuman vedotin also synergized with anti-PD-1.

Untangling the mechanism of enfortumab vedotin – an antibody–drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4 on cancer cells – Olson and Liu et al. showed that upon target binding, the drug is imported into the cell and transported to the lysosome, where MMAE is released, inducing direct cytotoxicity by disrupting microtubule formation and inducing ER stress and immunogenic cell death (ICD). Upon ICD, MMAE is released from the cell, killing nearby bystander cells. ICD also induces macrophage and DC activation, initiating protective antitumor immunity against both Nectin-4+ and Nectin-4- tumor cells. Enfortuman vedotin also synergized with anti-PD-1.

ABSTRACT: Enfortumab vedotin is a Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugate designed to deliver the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to tumor cells. Using preclinical models of urothelial cancer (UC), we expand the understanding of the multifaceted mechanism of action for enfortumab vedotin that includes direct cytotoxicity on Nectin-4-positive tumor cells, indirect bystander effect on neighboring Nectin-4-negative tumor cells, and MMAE-mediated induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) and associated increase in activated immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, vaccination with enfortumab vedotin-treated tumor cells results in protection against tumor rechallenge in mice, consistent with antitumor immunity. MMAE-mediated ICD induction modulates the tumor microenvironment in a complementary manner to immune checkpoint inhibition. Accordingly, enfortumab vedotin plus PD-1 inhibitor shows enhanced antitumor activity in vivo. These preclinical findings provide mechanistic hypotheses that may be relevant to the improved clinical outcomes observed for enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab relative to chemotherapy.

Author Info: (1) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (2) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (3) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (4) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (5) Pfizer,

Author Info: (1) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (2) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (3) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (4) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (5) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (6) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (7) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (8) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (9) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (10) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (11) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (12) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (13) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (14) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (15) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (16) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (17) Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (18) Astellas Pharma Inc., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. (19) Astellas Research Institute of America LLC, Northbrook, IL 60062, USA. (20) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (21) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. (22) Pfizer, Inc., Bothell, WA 98021, USA. Electronic address: sharsti.sandall@pfizer.com.

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.