Journal Articles

Agonistic anti-CD40 antibody treatment converts resident regulatory T cells into activated type 1 effectors within the tumor microenvironment Featured  

Maltez et al. reported that in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, treatment with agonist anti-CD40 induced spatial reorganization of Tregs within PDAC tumor microenvironments, and supported the conversion of conventional Tregs into “ExTregs”. These effects were dependent on cDC1s through Cxcl9/Cxcr3-mediated recruitment, IFNγ and IL-12 stimulation, and direct TCR–MHC-II interactions with Tregs in the tumor periphery. In Tregs, these interactions activated nuclear translocation of NFAT1, leading to Foxp3 loss and acquisition of Th1-like features, including Tbet and IFNγ expression. Observations in patient samples were consistent with this pattern, and loss of Tregs was associated with longer disease-free survival.

Maltez et al. reported that in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, treatment with agonist anti-CD40 induced spatial reorganization of Tregs within PDAC tumor microenvironments, and supported the conversion of conventional Tregs into “ExTregs”. These effects were dependent on cDC1s through Cxcl9/Cxcr3-mediated recruitment, IFNγ and IL-12 stimulation, and direct TCR–MHC-II interactions with Tregs in the tumor periphery. In Tregs, these interactions activated nuclear translocation of NFAT1, leading to Foxp3 loss and acquisition of Th1-like features, including Tbet and IFNγ expression. Observations in patient samples were consistent with this pattern, and loss of Tregs was associated with longer disease-free survival.

ABSTRACT: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), agonistic anti-CD40 (αCD40) reduces frequencies of intratumoral regulatory T (Treg) cells despite a lack of CD40 expression on Treg cells. Here, we leveraged spatiotemporal imaging and lineage tracing approaches to examine intratumoral Treg cell fate in a mouse model of PDAC, where immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) (αPD-1 + αCTLA-4) combined with αCD40 controls tumor growth. Intratumoral Foxp3+ Treg cell numbers collapsed upon treatment, dependent on CD40-activated dendritic cells (DCs) and induction of interleukin (IL)-12 and interferon (IFN)-γ. This reduction corresponded with cellular alterations; Treg cells acquired an "ExTreg" phenotype characterized by loss of Foxp3 expression and acquisition of T helper 1 (Th1)-like features (Tbet+IFN-γ+). αCD40 promoted a spatially reorganized tumor microenvironment (TME), with Cxcr3⁺ Treg and ExTreg cells localized to the tumor periphery with Cxcl9-expressing DCs. Through in situ analyses of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, we found that ExTreg cells had the highest antigen-driven activation among tumor-infiltrating T cells. Reprogramming of intratumoral Treg cells into Th1-like effectors reveals plasticity and an anti-tumor capacity of these cells.

Author Info: (1) Postdoctoral Research Associate Training (PRAT) Program Fellow, NIGMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Beth

Author Info: (1) Postdoctoral Research Associate Training (PRAT) Program Fellow, NIGMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. (2) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (3) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (4) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (5) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (6) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (7) Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. (8) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (9) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (10) The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (11) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (12) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (13) Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Center for Advanced Tissue Imaging (CAT-I), NIAID and NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: rgermain@niaid.nih.gov. (14) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: byrneka@ohsu.edu.

Developing a multimodal therapy for glioblastoma using oncolytic virus delivering CD19 and EGFRvIII antigens and bi-specific CARs

Spotlight 

Li et al. engineered an oncolytic vaccinia virus that expressed truncated CD19 and EGFRvIII on GBM cells (OVDual) and a bispecific CD19/EGFRvIII CAR-T (BiCAR-T). BiCAR-T cells effectively targeted OVDual-infected GBM cells in vitro, and intratumoral OVDual plus BiCAR-T reduced tumor burden in the xenograft model of GBM. Oncolytic vaccinia virus encoding mIL-15 and mIL-21 (OVmIL15/21) further enhanced CAR expansion, persistence, and cytotoxicity. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived (off-the-shelf) BiCAR-NK cells combined with OVDual and OVmIL15/21 showed similar antigen-specific cytotoxicity and in vivo efficacy, limiting immune escape.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Li et al. engineered an oncolytic vaccinia virus that expressed truncated CD19 and EGFRvIII on GBM cells (OVDual) and a bispecific CD19/EGFRvIII CAR-T (BiCAR-T). BiCAR-T cells effectively targeted OVDual-infected GBM cells in vitro, and intratumoral OVDual plus BiCAR-T reduced tumor burden in the xenograft model of GBM. Oncolytic vaccinia virus encoding mIL-15 and mIL-21 (OVmIL15/21) further enhanced CAR expansion, persistence, and cytotoxicity. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived (off-the-shelf) BiCAR-NK cells combined with OVDual and OVmIL15/21 showed similar antigen-specific cytotoxicity and in vivo efficacy, limiting immune escape.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with no cure, largely because of tumor heterogeneity and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is highly effective in blood cancers but exhibits limited efficacy in glioblastoma due to heterogeneous tumor antigen expression, antigen loss and poor persistence of tumor-targeting immune cells in glioblastoma. Here we show a multimodal immunotherapy strategy that integrates engineered immune cells with oncolytic viruses to overcome these barriers. We have developed bispecific CAR-T and CAR-NK cells in combination with oncolytic virus that delivers two tumor antigens to glioblastoma cells for effective CAR targeting. Moreover, oncolytic virus armed with membrane-bound interleukin-15 and interleukin-21 enhances immune cell expansion/persistence and cytotoxic activity. This combined approach improves anti-tumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo by limiting immune escape and enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Together, these findings establish a promising platform for multimodal immunotherapy targeting glioblastoma and other solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duar

Author Info: (1) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (3) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (4) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (5) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (6) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (7) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (8) Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (9) Department of Surgery, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. (10) Cellular Immunotherapy Program Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (11) Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, USA. yshi@coh.org.

PD-1 antibody-bound progenitor-exhausted CD8+ T cells in lymph nodes boost PD-1-blockade anti-tumor immunity in gastrointestinal cancer

Spotlight 

Utilizing scRNA/TCRseq, CITEseq, and a novel assay for cell-bound anti-PD-1 to study the dynamics of T cells targeted by anti-PD-1, Nose and Yasumizu et al. first found that abundance of progenitor-exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tpex) in metastasis-free lymph nodes (LNs), but not tumors or metastatic LNs, correlated with better prognosis in patients with anti-PD-1-naive gastric cancer. Anti-PD-1 promoted the proliferation of anti-PD-1high-bound Tpex in LNs, and clonotypes overlapped with intratumoral anti-PD-1-bound exhausted T cells (Tex), suggesting that anti-PD-1high-bound Tpex migrate to the tumor, where they differentiate into Tex.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

Utilizing scRNA/TCRseq, CITEseq, and a novel assay for cell-bound anti-PD-1 to study the dynamics of T cells targeted by anti-PD-1, Nose and Yasumizu et al. first found that abundance of progenitor-exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tpex) in metastasis-free lymph nodes (LNs), but not tumors or metastatic LNs, correlated with better prognosis in patients with anti-PD-1-naive gastric cancer. Anti-PD-1 promoted the proliferation of anti-PD-1high-bound Tpex in LNs, and clonotypes overlapped with intratumoral anti-PD-1-bound exhausted T cells (Tex), suggesting that anti-PD-1high-bound Tpex migrate to the tumor, where they differentiate into Tex.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

ABSTRACT: While progenitor-exhausted T cells (Tpex) expressing TCF1 and PD-1 are crucial for the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with therapeutic anti-PD-1 antibodies (aPD-1), the dynamics of ICI-bound Tpex are not fully understood. In this study, we investigate ICI-bound T cells in detail using combined sequencing analysis at the single-cell level. By analyzing samples from gastrointestinal cancer patients with or without ICI treatment, we find that Tpex are enriched in proximal lymph nodes (LNs) and proliferate at a high rate after ICI treatment. Importantly, aPD-1 high-bound Tpex in LNs share T-cell receptor clonotypes with intratumoral exhausted CD8(+) T cells (Tex), suggesting their migration to tumor sites after ICI treatment. This study thus provides new insights into how ICIs enhance anti-tumor immunity by acting on Tpex in LNs, deepening our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying ICI therapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate Sch

Author Info: (1) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (2) Experimental Immunology, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives (OTRI), The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (3) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. tsaito@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. tsaito@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. (4) Experimental Immunology, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (5) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (6) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (7) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (8) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (9) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (10) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (11) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (12) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (13) Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Pharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Japan. (14) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (15) Department of Pathology, Institute of Medical Science (Medical Research Center), Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. (16) Experimental Immunology, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Basic Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan. (17) Experimental Immunology, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (18) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. Department of Clinical Research in Tumor Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (19) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan. (20) Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.

In vivo CAR T cell generation using retargeted and functionalized lentiviral vectors with reduced immunogenicity Spotlight 

Measles virus (MeV) recognizes and fuses with target cells via hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins, respectively. To achieve T cell-specific transduction, Ibrahim et al. produced a lentivirus (LV) expressing MEV-F and a re-targeted MEV-H linked to a targeting molecule (VHHs resulted in higher functional titers than scFvs). To avoid serum neutralization by anti-MeV antibodies, MeV-H/F proteins were redesigned as chimeras with dolphin morbillivirus-H/F. LVs expressing the chimeric proteins, CD7-targeting VHH, and anti-CD3 and CD80 (activation cues) generated CD19 CAR T cells in vivo and slowed Nalm6 tumor growth. CAR expression was largely restricted to T cells.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

Measles virus (MeV) recognizes and fuses with target cells via hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins, respectively. To achieve T cell-specific transduction, Ibrahim et al. produced a lentivirus (LV) expressing MEV-F and a re-targeted MEV-H linked to a targeting molecule (VHHs resulted in higher functional titers than scFvs). To avoid serum neutralization by anti-MeV antibodies, MeV-H/F proteins were redesigned as chimeras with dolphin morbillivirus-H/F. LVs expressing the chimeric proteins, CD7-targeting VHH, and anti-CD3 and CD80 (activation cues) generated CD19 CAR T cells in vivo and slowed Nalm6 tumor growth. CAR expression was largely restricted to T cells.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ABSTRACT: Despite striking efficacy against hematologic malignancies, the cost and complexity of CAR T manufacturing present significant barriers to broader patient access. Beyond manufacturing challenges, ex vivo expansion of T cells may be detrimental to their function and persistence. Thus, delivery of CARs to reprogram host cells in vivo would represent a significant advance towards a readily available therapy, but has been limited by low efficiency, low specificity, and immunogenicity of viral vectors. Here, we describe the design of pseudotyped lentiviral vectors (LV) with superior functionality and high target specificity. We show that LV pseudotyped with chimeric envelope glycoproteins from dolphin morbillivirus (DMV) can be engineered to selectively infect human T cells and evade neutralizing antibody responses in measles-vaccinated human serum. We further demonstrate that camelid-derived nanobodies are a superior retargeting domain, overcoming limitations inherent to the use of single-chain variable fragment antibodies. Using a chimeric DMV-pseudotyped virus targeting the CD7 receptor, we demonstrate efficient and highly specific infection of T cells both in vitro and in vivo, generating functional CAR T cells and inducing therapeutic efficacy in a preclinical B cell lymphoma model.

Author Info: (1) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts Gen

Author Info: (1) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (2) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (3) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (4) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. (5) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (6) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (7) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (8) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (9) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (10) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (11) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. yates@broadinstitute.org. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. yates@broadinstitute.org. (12) Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. rmanguso@broadinstitute.org. Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. rmanguso@broadinstitute.org.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay inhibition reshapes the cancer immunopeptidome Featured  

Vendramin, Fu, Fernandez Patel, Zhao, et al. investigated nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in cancer, and detected high activity of this pathway in tumors, with lower scores associated with better ICB responses in clinical data. Inhibition of SMG1 reduced NMD activity and resulted in significant increases in immunogenic MHC-I-presented neoantigens. This resulted in improved antitumor immune responses and synergized with ICB in vivo.

Vendramin, Fu, Fernandez Patel, Zhao, et al. investigated nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in cancer, and detected high activity of this pathway in tumors, with lower scores associated with better ICB responses in clinical data. Inhibition of SMG1 reduced NMD activity and resulted in significant increases in immunogenic MHC-I-presented neoantigens. This resulted in improved antitumor immune responses and synergized with ICB in vivo.

ABSTRACT: DNA mutations are a well-characterized source of neoepitopes in immunotherapy. Here, we examined the contribution of dysregulated RNA processing to neoantigen production. Leveraging multi-omics and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) response data from >1,000 patients, we identified reduced activity of the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway kinase SMG1 as a predictor of improved CPI response. NMD inhibition through SMG1 targeting stabilized transcripts containing premature termination codons, most of which were of non-mutational origin. This reshaped the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC class I)-bound immunopeptidome and increased neoantigen abundance to levels comparable to high mutation burden tumors. Functionally, NMD inhibition drove antigen-dependent T cell-mediated tumor cell killing in vitro, promoted activation of tissue-resident T cells in patient-derived models ex vivo, and improved CPI efficacy in vivo. Our findings establish NMD inhibition as a strategy to harness a previously inaccessible source of canonical and non-canonical neoantigens, with the potential to increase tumor immunogenicity across cancers.

Author Info: (1) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Inst

Author Info: (1) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: r.vendramin@ucl.ac.uk. (2) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Pre-Cancer Immunology Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (3) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Organelle Dynamics Lab, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Organelle Dynamics Lab, the Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. (4) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. (5) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (6) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (7) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (8) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (9) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (10) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (11) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (12) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Drug Discovery Technology Laboratories, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan. (13) Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. (14) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (15) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (16) CRUK City of London Centre Single Cell Genomics Facility, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Bioinformatics Hub, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (17) Proteomics Research Translational Technology Platform, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (18) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain; Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (19) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Immune Regulation and Tumor Immunotherapy Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (20) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK. (21) Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands. (22) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (23) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (24) Research Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (25) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Immune Regulation and Tumor Immunotherapy Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Immune Regulation Lab, Centre for Immuno-Oncology, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. (26) Organoid Translational Technology Platform, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (27) Proteomics Research Translational Technology Platform, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (28) Department of Research Pathology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (29) CRUK City of London Explant and Patient-Derived Xenograft Core, London, UK. (30) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (31) Organelle Dynamics Lab, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Organelle Dynamics Lab, the Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. (32) Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. (33) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Pre-Cancer Immunology Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. (34) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (35) Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: charles.swanton@crick.ac.uk. (36) CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Immune Regulation and Tumor Immunotherapy Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: s.quezada@ucl.ac.uk. (37) The Tumor Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: k.litchfield@ucl.ac.uk.

Lymphodepleting preconditioning impairs host antitumor immunity induced by adoptive T cell therapy in mouse models

Spotlight 

Figueroa et al. demonstrated that lasting efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) against solid tumors relied not only on the antitumor activity of transferred T cells, but also on their ability to expand host CD8+ T cells in a TNF- and cDC1-dependent manner. Host CD8+ T cells protected against rechallenge with ACT-resistant antigen-negative tumor cells. Lymphodepleting preconditioning promoted transferred T cell expansion, but impaired host immunity against antigen-loss variants. In patients with melanoma, enrichment of cDC1, TNF signaling, Tpex and Tex gene signatures correlated with clinical responses to ACT and better overall survival.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

Figueroa et al. demonstrated that lasting efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) against solid tumors relied not only on the antitumor activity of transferred T cells, but also on their ability to expand host CD8+ T cells in a TNF- and cDC1-dependent manner. Host CD8+ T cells protected against rechallenge with ACT-resistant antigen-negative tumor cells. Lymphodepleting preconditioning promoted transferred T cell expansion, but impaired host immunity against antigen-loss variants. In patients with melanoma, enrichment of cDC1, TNF signaling, Tpex and Tex gene signatures correlated with clinical responses to ACT and better overall survival.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

ABSTRACT: Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) is effective against hematologic cancers, but the mechanisms underlying durable responses in solid tumors remain unclear. We show that adoptively transferred CD8(+) T cells that eradicate established murine tumors promote expansion of host CD8(+) T cells exhibiting tumor-reactive and tissue-resident phenotypes that contribute to tumor elimination. Mechanistically, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) from transferred cells induces dendritic cell (DC)-dependent expansion of host CD8(+) T cells, conferring protection against ACT-resistant tumor cells lacking the targeted antigen. Lymphodepleting preconditioning promotes expansion of transferred cells and primary tumor eradication but impairs host antitumor immunity and abrogates protection against ACT-resistant tumors. In human tumors, increased TNF/DC/CD8(+) T cell profiles correlate with favorable ACT responses and improved survival. These findings reveal a TNF-dependent interplay between transferred and host CD8(+) T cells underlying durable antitumor immunity that is impaired by lymphodepleting preconditioning in mouse models, suggesting an underappreciated mechanism of ACT resistance.

Author Info: (1) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (2) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (3) Centro Basal Ciencia & V

Author Info: (1) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (2) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (3) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Centro de Investigaci—n e Innovaci—n en C‡ncer, Fundaci—n Arturo L—pez PŽrez OECI Cancer Center, Santiago, Chile. (4) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (5) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Centro de Investigaci—n e Innovaci—n en C‡ncer, Fundaci—n Arturo L—pez PŽrez OECI Cancer Center, Santiago, Chile. (6) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (7) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (8) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (9) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. (10) Laboratory of Immunology and Cellular Stress, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. (11) Laboratory of Immune Regulation, NDM Centre for Immuno-Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. (12) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. (13) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Centro de Biolog’a Celular y Biomedicina (CEBICEM), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebasti‡n, Santiago, Chile. (14) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Laboratory of Immunology, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. (15) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. Laboratory of Immunology and Cellular Stress, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. (16) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. vincenzo.borgna@uss.cl. Servicio de Urolog’a, Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau, Santiago, Chile. vincenzo.borgna@uss.cl. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Sebasti‡n, Santiago, Chile. vincenzo.borgna@uss.cl. (17) Centro Basal Ciencia & Vida, Fundaci—n Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile. alladser@cienciavida.org. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Sebasti‡n, Santiago, Chile. alladser@cienciavida.org.

In vivo generation of CAR myeloid cells through erythrocyte-mediated mRNA delivery for cancer immunotherapy Spotlight 

Nie, Liu, Song, and Yao et al. developed a spleen delivery platform of mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) covalently bound to erythrocytes (mRNA-LNP-Ery), which naturally target splenic CD11b+ myeloid cells. Unlike conventional LNPs, mRNA-LNP-Ery entered cells via phagocytosis, avoiding lysosomal degradation and efficiently delivering mRNA. CAR myeloid cells (HER2 or CD19) adopted a proinflammatory antigen-presenting phenotype, migrated to tumors, and stimulated T and NK cell influx, potent antitumor activity, and systemic immunity, which was spleen-dependent. Repeated doses of mRNA-LNP-Ery resulted in superior efficacy at 1/10 the dose of LNPs.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

Nie, Liu, Song, and Yao et al. developed a spleen delivery platform of mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) covalently bound to erythrocytes (mRNA-LNP-Ery), which naturally target splenic CD11b+ myeloid cells. Unlike conventional LNPs, mRNA-LNP-Ery entered cells via phagocytosis, avoiding lysosomal degradation and efficiently delivering mRNA. CAR myeloid cells (HER2 or CD19) adopted a proinflammatory antigen-presenting phenotype, migrated to tumors, and stimulated T and NK cell influx, potent antitumor activity, and systemic immunity, which was spleen-dependent. Repeated doses of mRNA-LNP-Ery resulted in superior efficacy at 1/10 the dose of LNPs.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Engineering myeloid cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) holds great therapeutic promise, but their generation in vivo remains challenging. Here, we developed an erythrocyte-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) delivery platform, termed mRNA-LNP-Ery, in which mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are covalently anchored onto erythrocytes. Exploiting erythrocytes' intrinsic splenic homing capacity and unique biocompatibility, mRNA-LNP-Ery enables highly selective and efficient mRNA delivery to CD11b(+) myeloid cells in the spleen, with minimal uptake by hepatocytes. We also demonstrated that mRNA-LNP-Ery is internalized through phagocytosis and avoids lysosomal degradation, resulting in enhanced cytosolic mRNA translation. Delivery of mRNAs encoding CARs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) or CD19 generated functional CAR myeloid cells in vivo that adopted a proinflammatory, antigen-presenting phenotype. These cells migrated to tumors, eliminated cancer cells, and remodeled the tumor microenvironment, leading to increased infiltration of effector T and natural killer (NK) cells. The antitumor effect was abolished in splenectomized mice and partially diminished in nude mice, indicating that therapeutic activity depends on both CAR myeloid cell formation within the spleen and their cross-talk with adaptive immunity. Furthermore, repeated administration of mRNA-LNP-Ery achieved superior antitumor efficacy to conventional mRNA-LNPs at one-tenth the mRNA dose, with minimal systemic toxicity, underscoring the high efficiency and safety of spleen-targeted delivery. Together, our findings established a clinically translatable erythrocyte-based mRNA platform that enables direct in vivo immune cell programming and advances CAR myeloid therapies for solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. Westlake La

Author Info: (1) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. (2) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. Research Center for Industries of the Future and School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. (3) Westlake Therapeutics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. (4) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. (5) Westlake Therapeutics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. (6) Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. (7) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. Research Center for Industries of the Future and School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China.

Immunogenic tumor cell death and T-cell-derived IFN-γ elicit tumoricidal macrophages to potentiate OX40 immunotherapy

Spotlight 

Using a bilateral, humanized OX40 MC38 tumor model, Liu and Zhao et al. demonstrated that OX40 agonist Ab (agOX40) therapy increased infiltration of NOS2+ pro-inflammatory macrophages and effector CD8+ T cells. T cell-derived IFNγ synergized with DAMP-induced TLR4 signaling to reprogram TAMs toward a pro-inflammatory and tumoricidal NOS2+ state. agOX40-mediated depletion of OX40+Foxp3+ Tregs further potentiated NOS2+ TAM polarization. A combination of MPLA, IFNγ, and agOX40 reprogrammed TAMs, promoted DC maturation, and induced durable tumor regression. ICD-inducing cyclophosphamide enhanced agOX40 therapy.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Using a bilateral, humanized OX40 MC38 tumor model, Liu and Zhao et al. demonstrated that OX40 agonist Ab (agOX40) therapy increased infiltration of NOS2+ pro-inflammatory macrophages and effector CD8+ T cells. T cell-derived IFNγ synergized with DAMP-induced TLR4 signaling to reprogram TAMs toward a pro-inflammatory and tumoricidal NOS2+ state. agOX40-mediated depletion of OX40+Foxp3+ Tregs further potentiated NOS2+ TAM polarization. A combination of MPLA, IFNγ, and agOX40 reprogrammed TAMs, promoted DC maturation, and induced durable tumor regression. ICD-inducing cyclophosphamide enhanced agOX40 therapy.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Understanding the mechanisms limiting OX40 agonist antibody efficacy is critical for developing more effective combination immunotherapies. Tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis revealed that OX40-antibody-responsive mice harbored tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) with elevated NOS2 expression and heightened pattern recognition receptor (PRR) activation and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) signaling. In addition, patients with more favorable treatment responses to OX40 antibody therapy exhibited increased NOS2 expression. Mechanistically, tumor-infiltrating T-cell-derived IFN-γ synergizes with endogenous ligands of PRR released during immunogenic cell death to drive NOS2+ TAMs reprogramming. Translating these insights into therapeutic strategy, a Combo approach composing of MPLA, IFN-γ, and OX40 agonist antibody is designed to actively polarize TAMs to express NOS2, which mediate tumor clearance through an NOS2-dependent cytotoxicity. Moreover, OX40-antibody-mediated regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion potentiated NOS2+ macrophage induction. This multimodal strategy offers a promising solution to overcome the limitations of OX40 antibody monotherapy and enhance outcomes of the OX40-targeted immunotherapies.

Author Info: (1) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Na

Author Info: (1) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; Henan Provincial People's Hospital & the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China; Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450046, China. (2) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518071, China. (3) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (4) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (5) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (6) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (7) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (8) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (9) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (10) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (11) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (12) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (13) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (14) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (15) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (16) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (17) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (18) Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China. (19) HiFiBiO (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. (20) HiFiBiO (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. (21) HiFiBiO (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. (22) NovelBio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201114, China. (23) Faculty of Life Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. (24) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (25) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. (26) Henan Provincial People's Hospital & the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China. (27) State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, College of Life Sciences and Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China. Electronic address: hongkai@nankai.edu.cn.

Tim-3-targeted vaccines overcome tumor immunosuppression and reduce cDC1 dependence to elicit potent anti-tumor immunity Spotlight 

Fu et al. showed that an i.v. or s.c. Tim3-targeted vaccine, generated by conjugating antigens to anti-Tim3 antibodies, delivered antigens to both cDC1s and cDC2s and elicited robust and durable CD8+ T cell responses. This Tim3-targeted vaccine restored cross-priming in both β-catenin-driven DC dysfunction and established tumor-mediated immunosuppression across different tumor settings. In Batf3-/- mice lacking cDC1s, CD8+ T cell priming and tumor control were reduced, but not eliminated. A single dose of anti-Tim3 neoantigen vaccine eradicated large established solid tumors and generated memory responses in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Fu et al. showed that an i.v. or s.c. Tim3-targeted vaccine, generated by conjugating antigens to anti-Tim3 antibodies, delivered antigens to both cDC1s and cDC2s and elicited robust and durable CD8+ T cell responses. This Tim3-targeted vaccine restored cross-priming in both β-catenin-driven DC dysfunction and established tumor-mediated immunosuppression across different tumor settings. In Batf3-/- mice lacking cDC1s, CD8+ T cell priming and tumor control were reduced, but not eliminated. A single dose of anti-Tim3 neoantigen vaccine eradicated large established solid tumors and generated memory responses in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) are specialized for cross-presenting tumor antigens and determining the efficacy of immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell therapy. However, their rarity and tumor-induced dysfunction severely limit CD8 T cell priming and represent a central bottleneck to therapeutic efficacy. While strategies such as anti-DEC-205-mediated antigen delivery and Flt3L-driven DC expansion can enhance host DC function, their reliance on functional cDC1s remains a significant constraint. We developed Tim-3-targeted vaccines by conjugating tumor antigens or neoantigens to anti-Tim-3 antibodies. These vaccines delivered antigens to both cDC1s and cDC2s, and elicited robust, durable CD8 T cell responses. Remarkably, Tim-3-targeted vaccines endowed cDC2s with efficient cross-presentation capacity that matched that of cDC1s. In tumor-bearing mice or in CD11c-_-catenin(active) mice, which model _-catenin-driven DC dysfunction, Tim-3-targeted vaccination restored cross-priming and counteracted tumor- and DC-mediated immunosuppression. In Batf3(-/-) mice lacking cDC1s, anti-Tim-3-based vaccines still elicited significant CD8 T cell cross-priming and tumor control-albeit both were reduced compared to wild-type mice- demonstrating that cDC1s contribute to but are not essential for Tim-3-targeted vaccine-induced CD8 T cell priming and anti-tumor efficacy. Strikingly, a single dose of anti-Tim-3-neoantigen vaccination eradicated large established MC38 tumors in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner. Together, these data identify Tim-3-targeted vaccines as a next-generation cancer vaccine platform that broadens DC engagement, reduces reliance on cDC1s, and overcomes tumor- and DC-mediated immunosuppression, addressing key limitations of current DC-based cancer vaccines.

Author Info: (1) Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI 48202. Immunology Program, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health

Author Info: (1) Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI 48202. Immunology Program, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. (2) Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309. (3) Institute for Molecular Medicine and Research Center for Immunotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz 55131, Germany. (4) Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA 94129. (5) Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI 48202. Immunology Program, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Reactivating exhausted tumor-infiltrating T cells by a bispecific DC-T cell engager in mice Spotlight 

Zhang, Gao, and Hu et al. addressed ways to enhance DC–T cell crosstalk in the TIME. BiDT, a bispecific DC–T cell engager (anti-Tim3–IFNα fusion), simultaneously bound Tim3 on exhausted TILs and activated DCs via the IFNAR receptor. In mouse models, BiDT resulted in potent antitumor activity, robust tumor specific memory, and synergized with anti-PD-L1 in an immune-cold tumor model. Mechanistically, BiDT depended on DCs and intratumoral, not LN, T cells, reactivated exhausted TIM3+ CD8+ TILs via anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 upregulation, and enhanced DC function via increased IL-2 production and B7/CD28 interactions. To address IFNα toxicity, an MMP-cleavable prodrug variant was generated.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

Zhang, Gao, and Hu et al. addressed ways to enhance DC–T cell crosstalk in the TIME. BiDT, a bispecific DC–T cell engager (anti-Tim3–IFNα fusion), simultaneously bound Tim3 on exhausted TILs and activated DCs via the IFNAR receptor. In mouse models, BiDT resulted in potent antitumor activity, robust tumor specific memory, and synergized with anti-PD-L1 in an immune-cold tumor model. Mechanistically, BiDT depended on DCs and intratumoral, not LN, T cells, reactivated exhausted TIM3+ CD8+ TILs via anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 upregulation, and enhanced DC function via increased IL-2 production and B7/CD28 interactions. To address IFNα toxicity, an MMP-cleavable prodrug variant was generated.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Tumor infiltrating T cells (TIL) are key players in the anti-tumor immune response. However, chronic exposure to tumor-derived antigens drives the differentiation into 'exhausted' TILs. Whether intratumoral dendritic cells (DC) can mitigate TILs exhaustion and maintain function is unclear. Here, we develop a bispecific DC-T cell engager (BiDT), consisting of an anti-TIM3-IFN fusion protein, and demonstrate that, in preclinical mouse tumor models, this engager simultaneously targets TIM3 on exhausted TILs and activates DCs via the IFNAR receptor. Mechanistically, BiDT reactivates exhausted TIM3(+)TILs by preventing apoptosis through increased Bcl-2 expression and enhances DC function to reactivate T cells via IL-2 signalling and co-stimulatory CD80/86-CD28 interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Finally, to mitigate IFN_-induced toxicity, we engineer a Pro-BiDT engager featuring a pro-IFN_ and report potent antitumor activity with reduced systemic toxicity. Thus, by bridging DC-T cells together, BiDT treatment enhances the critical communication pathways and cellular circuits necessary for effective anti-tumor immunity.

Author Info: (1) Institute for Data-Driven Tumor Immunology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. xuhaozhang@cqmu.edu.cn. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beiji

Author Info: (1) Institute for Data-Driven Tumor Immunology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. xuhaozhang@cqmu.edu.cn. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. xuhaozhang@cqmu.edu.cn. Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. xuhaozhang@cqmu.edu.cn. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. xuhaozhang@cqmu.edu.cn. (2) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. (3) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. (4) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. (5) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. (6) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. (7) National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. (8) Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China. (9) National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. (10) Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China. (11) CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. (12) Guangzhou National Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, China. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. (13) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. wywang2022@tsinghua.edu.cn. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. wywang2022@tsinghua.edu.cn. (14) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yangxinfu@tsinghua.edu.cn. State Key Laboratory of Molecular oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yangxinfu@tsinghua.edu.cn. Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China. yangxinfu@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.