Using multiple forms of anti-CTLA-4 antibody, Du et al. discovered that the antitumor mechanism of anti-CTLA-4 surprisingly requires none of the following: blockade of the CTLA-4/B7 interaction, inhibition of B7 trans-endocytosis, upregulation of B7 on dendritic cells, de novo CD8+ T cell priming, or CD4+ T cell activation. Instead, the antitumor effect of anti-CTLA-4 is dependent on the local depletion of Tregs via interactions with the Fc receptor on other host cells and the subsequent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.
It is assumed that anti-CTLA-4 antibodies cause tumor rejection by blocking negative signaling from B7-CTLA-4 interactions. Surprisingly, at concentrations considerably higher than plasma levels achieved by clinically effective dosing, the anti-CTLA-4 antibody Ipilimumab blocks neither B7 trans-endocytosis by CTLA-4 nor CTLA-4 binding to immobilized or cell-associated B7. Consequently, Ipilimumab does not increase B7 on dendritic cells (DCs) from either CTLA4 gene humanized (Ctla4 (h/h) ) or human CD34(+) stem cell-reconstituted NSG mice. In Ctla4 (h/m) mice expressing both human and mouse CTLA4 genes, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies that bind to human but not mouse CTLA-4 efficiently induce Treg depletion and Fc receptor-dependent tumor rejection. The blocking antibody L3D10 is comparable to the non-blocking Ipilimumab in causing tumor rejection. Remarkably, L3D10 progenies that lose blocking activity during humanization remain fully competent in inducing Treg depletion and tumor rejection. Anti-B7 antibodies that effectively block CD4 T cell activation and de novo CD8 T cell priming in lymphoid organs do not negatively affect the immunotherapeutic effect of Ipilimumab. Thus, clinically effective anti-CTLA-4 mAb causes tumor rejection by mechanisms that are independent of checkpoint blockade but dependent on the host Fc receptor. Our data call for a reappraisal of the CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade hypothesis and provide new insights for the next generation of safe and effective anti-CTLA-4 mAbs.