Journal Articles

Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals tumor-immune determinants of lymph node colonization and progression in thyroid cancer Spotlight 

(1) Nguyen AT (2) Viramontes J (3) Vazquez I (4) McWilliam C (5) Devarakonda V (6) Henson R (7) Sacks WL (8) Mallen-St Clair J (9) Chen Y (10) Walgama E (11) Scher KS (12) Moyers J (13) Sandler HM (14) Jang JK (15) Zumsteg ZS (16) Shon W (17) Shiao SL (18) Ho AS

Science advances | Free PMC Article

Nguyen et al. used single-cell RNAseq and multiplex IHC on paired primary thyroid carcinomas and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) to define immune determinants of nodal colonization. In metastatic LNs, thyrocytes and TAMs downregulated inflammatory cytokine receptors. including TNFRSF12A and CX3CR1, and were enriched for Tregs relative to matched primary tumors, which suggests suppression of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic LNs showed increased IL7R expression, and high IL7R levels within nodal metastases correlated with enhanced immune activation and improved progression-free survival in a validation cohort.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

(1) Nguyen AT (2) Viramontes J (3) Vazquez I (4) McWilliam C (5) Devarakonda V (6) Henson R (7) Sacks WL (8) Mallen-St Clair J (9) Chen Y (10) Walgama E (11) Scher KS (12) Moyers J (13) Sandler HM (14) Jang JK (15) Zumsteg ZS (16) Shon W (17) Shiao SL (18) Ho AS

Science advances | Free PMC Article

Nguyen et al. used single-cell RNAseq and multiplex IHC on paired primary thyroid carcinomas and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) to define immune determinants of nodal colonization. In metastatic LNs, thyrocytes and TAMs downregulated inflammatory cytokine receptors. including TNFRSF12A and CX3CR1, and were enriched for Tregs relative to matched primary tumors, which suggests suppression of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic LNs showed increased IL7R expression, and high IL7R levels within nodal metastases correlated with enhanced immune activation and improved progression-free survival in a validation cohort.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Lymph node (LN) metastases are a major driver of mortality across solid cancers, including thyroid carcinomas, which are known for high rates of nodal colonization. To elucidate the determinants of nodal spread, we isolated tumor-infiltrating leukocytes from primary thyroid tumors and matched metastatic LNs for single-cell RNA sequencing with validation by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Comparing the microenvironmental alterations between primary tumors and their LNs, we found that thyrocytes and tumor-associated macrophages down-regulate the expression of multiple inflammatory cytokine receptors, including TNFRSF12A and CX3CR1, upon LN colonization. LNs were associated with the induction of regulatory T cells to suppress T cell-mediated cytotoxicity compared to matched primary tumors. Notably, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes within LNs demonstrated increased expression of activation markers, including interleukin-7 receptor (IL7R). High LN expression of IL7R was significantly correlated with improved outcomes and can serve as a biomarker in this heterogeneous disease. Our findings on the dynamic equilibrium within LN metastases may offer conserved mechanisms for nodal colonization across solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA,

Author Info: (1) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (2) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (3) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (4) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (5) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (6) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (7) Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (8) Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (9) Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (10) Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (11) Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (12) Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (13) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (14) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (15) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (16) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (17) Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. (18) Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Citation: Sci Adv 2026 Jul 3 12:eaea4727 Epub07/03/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42397917

Tags:

Sustained A2AR expression and loss paradoxically promote CD8+ T cell exhaustion

Spotlight 

(1) Song L (2) Kharel A (3) Xie P (4) Fan J (5) Baker A (6) Zhang Y (7) Zhang Y (8) Cui W (9) Zhang B

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | Free PMC Article

Using single-cell multiomics and genetic models, Song and Kharel et al. showed that, paradoxically, both sustained A2AR expression under chronic antigen exposure and hypoxia, and complete loss of A2AR drive the transition of TCFhi memory-like progenitor (Tpro) cells to exhausted T cells. A2AR expression was rapidly induced upon TCR stimulation and was required to sustain CD8+ T cell functions. Persistent A2AR expression promoted continuous TCR engagement and CD8+ T cell exhaustion via activation of the GαS-cAMP-PKA pathway. A2AR depletion led to epigenetic remodeling and activation of CD122 (IL-2Rβ)-dependent signaling, driving exhaustion.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

(1) Song L (2) Kharel A (3) Xie P (4) Fan J (5) Baker A (6) Zhang Y (7) Zhang Y (8) Cui W (9) Zhang B

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | Free PMC Article

Using single-cell multiomics and genetic models, Song and Kharel et al. showed that, paradoxically, both sustained A2AR expression under chronic antigen exposure and hypoxia, and complete loss of A2AR drive the transition of TCFhi memory-like progenitor (Tpro) cells to exhausted T cells. A2AR expression was rapidly induced upon TCR stimulation and was required to sustain CD8+ T cell functions. Persistent A2AR expression promoted continuous TCR engagement and CD8+ T cell exhaustion via activation of the GαS-cAMP-PKA pathway. A2AR depletion led to epigenetic remodeling and activation of CD122 (IL-2Rβ)-dependent signaling, driving exhaustion.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

ABSTRACT: Although A2AR is a key immunoregulatory receptor that suppresses CD8(+) T cell activation in response to elevated extracellular adenosine in inflamed or hypoxic microenvironments, its role in CD8(+) T cell differentiation and cell-fate decisions during chronic viral infection and cancer remains poorly understood. Using A2AR-eGFP reporter mice, we show that A2AR expression is rapidly induced by TCR stimulation and persists under chronic antigen exposure and hypoxia, with sustained expression strongly associated with terminal exhaustion via the canonical G_(s)-cAMP-PKA pathway. Paradoxically, A2AR loss does not alleviate exhaustion but instead accelerates differentiation toward the terminally exhausted state. Single-cell multiomics profiling revealed that A2AR deficiency activates CD122 (IL-2R_)-dependent signaling, driving T cell exhaustion. Genetic deletion of CD122 in A2AR-deficient CD8(+) T cells reduced terminal exhaustion, identifying CD122 signaling as a key mediator of A2AR loss-driven exhaustion. Intriguingly, both sustained A2AR expression and A2AR loss converge to promote T cell exhaustion differentiation through distinct mechanisms. These findings uncover a paradoxical role of A2AR in shaping CD8(+) T cell fate choices during chronic infection and cancer.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611. ROR: https://ror.org/02p4far57 (2) Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611. (3) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611. ROR: https://ror.org/02p4far57 (4) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611. ROR: https://ror.org/02p4far57 (5) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611. ROR: https://ror.org/02p4far57 (6) Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611. (7) Biotherapy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China. ROR: https://ror.org/056swr059 (8) Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611. (9) Department of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology Division, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL 60611. ROR: https://ror.org/02p4far57

Citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2026 Jul 7 123:e2602385123 Epub06/30/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42378284

Tags:

Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy with durvalumab and oleclumab in ER+HER2- breast cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial

Featured  

(1) De Caluwé A (2) Desmoulins I (3) Cao K (4) Remouchamps V (5) Baten A (6) Longton E (7) Peignaux K (8) Joaquin Garcia A (9) Venet D (10) Arecco L (11) Agostinetto E (12) Nader-Marta G (13) Denis Z (14) Dhont J (15) Kristanto P (16) Catteau X (17) Larsimont D (18) Salgado R (19) Poortmans P (20) Stagg J (21) Sotiriou C (22) Piccart M (23) Ignatiadis M (24) Romano E (25) Buisseret L

Nature medicine

De Caluwé et al. conducted a phase 2 clinical trial in patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immune-modulating stereotactic body radiation therapy (iSBRT) alone or combined with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD73 ICB. The addition of single or double ICB improved residual cancer burden and complete response rates. Patients with node-positive, PD-L1-negative tumors containing stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline benefited most, with treatment modulating the tumor immune microenvironment from cold to hot.

(1) De Caluwé A (2) Desmoulins I (3) Cao K (4) Remouchamps V (5) Baten A (6) Longton E (7) Peignaux K (8) Joaquin Garcia A (9) Venet D (10) Arecco L (11) Agostinetto E (12) Nader-Marta G (13) Denis Z (14) Dhont J (15) Kristanto P (16) Catteau X (17) Larsimont D (18) Salgado R (19) Poortmans P (20) Stagg J (21) Sotiriou C (22) Piccart M (23) Ignatiadis M (24) Romano E (25) Buisseret L

Nature medicine

De Caluwé et al. conducted a phase 2 clinical trial in patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immune-modulating stereotactic body radiation therapy (iSBRT) alone or combined with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD73 ICB. The addition of single or double ICB improved residual cancer burden and complete response rates. Patients with node-positive, PD-L1-negative tumors containing stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline benefited most, with treatment modulating the tumor immune microenvironment from cold to hot.

ABSTRACT: Patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative, early breast cancer (BC) have low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide limited benefit in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative tumors, characterized by an immune-cold tumor microenvironment. Here we hypothesized that immune-modulating stereotactic body radiation therapy (iSBRT; 3 × 8 Gy) could enhance response through tumor microenvironment reprogramming, and that CD73 blockade could further improve efficacy. We conducted a phase 2, randomized, multicenter trial (Neo-CheckRay) in 147 female patients with high-risk, ER+HER2- early BC. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus iSBRT alone (No_ICI), with anti-PD-L1 durvalumab (Single_ICI) or with durvalumab plus anti-CD73 oleclumab (Double_ICI). In the intention-to-treat population, the primary endpoint, residual cancer burden 0/1 rate, was 35.4% with No_ICI, 45.1% with Single_ICI and 47.9% with Double_ICI, without statistically significant differences. pCR rates were 16.7%, 29.4% and 33.3%, respectively (P = 0.059). In the per-protocol population (MammaPrint High Risk, n = 131), pCR rates were 16.3%, 32.6% and 35.6%, respectively (P = 0.040). Among PD-L1-negative tumors (n = 91), pCR rates were 3.4%, 28.1% and 30.0%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. Baseline transcriptomic analysis showed low immune signature expression in PD-L1-negative tumors. Paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies obtained 1 week after iSBRT demonstrated tumor microenvironment reprogramming toward an inflamed phenotype in the iSBRT + anti-PD-L1 arms. These findings suggest that iSBRT + anti-PD-L1 may convert immune-cold ER+HER2- BC into more inflamed tumors and improve response, particularly in PD-L1-negative disease. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03875573 .

Author Info: (1) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. alex.decaluwe@bordet.be. (2) Centre Georges-Franoi

Author Info: (1) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. alex.decaluwe@bordet.be. (2) Centre Georges-Franois Leclerc, UniversitŽ Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France. (3) Institut Curie, Paris, France. (4) CHU St Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium. (5) Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. (6) H™pital Universitaire St Luc, Brussels, Belgium. (7) Centre Georges-Franois Leclerc, UniversitŽ Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France. (8) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (9) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (10) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (11) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (12) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (13) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (14) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (15) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (16) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (17) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (18) ZAS Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium. Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. (19) Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium. University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. (20) Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (21) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (22) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (23) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. (24) Institut Curie, Paris, France. (25) Institut Jules Bordet, H™pitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), UniversitŽ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Citation: Nat Med 2026 Jun 25 Epub06/25/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42350643

Tags:

IL-2 mutein promotes antigen-specific transplant acceptance in mice through expansion of ST2(+) regulatory T cells Spotlight 

(1) Ganchiku Y (2) Ribas GT (3) Lima K (4) Gassen RB (5) Liu K (6) Efe O (7) Griffith JW (8) Luster AD (9) Shriver Z (10) Babcock GJ (11) Rosales IA (12) LeGuern C (13) Borges TJ (14) Riella LV

Nature communications | Free PMC Article

Focused on improving transplantation tolerance, Ganchiku et al. evaluated a long-lived, high-affinity receptor binding IL-2 mutein (mIL-2) in multiple solid organ transplantation models. mIL-2 therapy (with transient co-stimulation blockade) significantly improved long-term allograft survival in an Ag-specific manner, which persisted after cessation of treatment. Allograft survival was accompanied by Treg activation, decreased effector T cell activation, and reduced donor specific antibody levels. mIL-2-mediated allograft survival depended on expansion of highly active and suppressive tissue ST2+ Tregs and was abrogated in Treg-specific ST2 KO graft recipients.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

(1) Ganchiku Y (2) Ribas GT (3) Lima K (4) Gassen RB (5) Liu K (6) Efe O (7) Griffith JW (8) Luster AD (9) Shriver Z (10) Babcock GJ (11) Rosales IA (12) LeGuern C (13) Borges TJ (14) Riella LV

Nature communications | Free PMC Article

Focused on improving transplantation tolerance, Ganchiku et al. evaluated a long-lived, high-affinity receptor binding IL-2 mutein (mIL-2) in multiple solid organ transplantation models. mIL-2 therapy (with transient co-stimulation blockade) significantly improved long-term allograft survival in an Ag-specific manner, which persisted after cessation of treatment. Allograft survival was accompanied by Treg activation, decreased effector T cell activation, and reduced donor specific antibody levels. mIL-2-mediated allograft survival depended on expansion of highly active and suppressive tissue ST2+ Tregs and was abrogated in Treg-specific ST2 KO graft recipients.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Although transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage organ disease, long-term outcomes are limited by immunosuppressive drug toxicity and immune-mediated injury. Selective in vivo expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) using interleukin-2 (IL-2) analogs has emerged as a strategy to induce antigen-specific transplant tolerance with fewer side effects. Herein, we investigate the therapeutic efficacy of an IL-2 mutein molecule (mIL-2) with enhanced receptor specificity and extended half-life in murine models of solid organ transplantation. mIL-2 therapy significantly improves allograft survival in an antigen-specific manner, accompanied by increased Treg activation, decreased effector T cell activation and reduced donor-specific antibody production. Transcriptional profiling reveals expansion of Tregs expressing the suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) Tregs with heightened activation status and suppressive function. Accordingly, the mIL-2-induced long-term allograft survival is abrogated in Treg-specific ST2 knockout graft recipients, underscoring the critical role of ST2(+) Tregs. These findings identify mIL-2 as an approach to promote long-term transplant tolerance while reducing reliance on conventional immunosuppression.

Author Info: (1) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Department of Gastroenterological Surg

Author Info: (1) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. (2) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (3) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (4) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (5) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (6) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (7) Center for Immunology & Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (8) Center for Immunology & Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (9) Visterra, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA. (10) Visterra, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA. (11) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (12) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (13) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. (14) Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. LRIELLA@mgh.harvard.edu. Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. LRIELLA@mgh.harvard.edu.

Citation: Nat Commun 2026 Jun 22 17: Epub06/22/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42331795

Tags:

Treg cells promote immunotherapy-induced immune evasion by restraining CD4 T cell control of MHC-I-deficient metastatic pancreatic cancer

Featured  

(1) Schmiechen ZC (2) Cruz-Hinojoza E (3) Hilk AL (4) Ellefson MA (5) Tsai AK (6) Dres OM (7) Kang LI (8) Geuenich MJ (9) Butler JZ (10) Burrack AL (11) Larsen BM (12) Hickok GH (13) Miller EA (14) Lonetree CL (15) Gaire A (16) Pandey R (17) Nanda HA (18) Chaudhury I (19) Corbiere T (20) Dileepan T (21) Shen SS (22) Campbell KR (23) DeNardo DG (24) Stromnes IM

Science immunology

Schmiechen et al. found that variants of PDA that escaped following PD-L1 blockade showed epigenetic silencing of Tap1 expression, which induced loss of IFNγ-inducible MHC-I and reduced tumor cell killing mediated by CD8+ T cell. Escape variants also had an increased capacity for metastasis, which was promoted by Tregs and their suppressive effect on conventional CD4+ T cells. Combination strategies involving restoring IFNγ-inducible MHC-I, targeting Tregs, and enhancing Tconv enabled more effective cancer immunotherapy, suggesting potentially targetable mechanisms to enhance immunotherapy in PDA.

(1) Schmiechen ZC (2) Cruz-Hinojoza E (3) Hilk AL (4) Ellefson MA (5) Tsai AK (6) Dres OM (7) Kang LI (8) Geuenich MJ (9) Butler JZ (10) Burrack AL (11) Larsen BM (12) Hickok GH (13) Miller EA (14) Lonetree CL (15) Gaire A (16) Pandey R (17) Nanda HA (18) Chaudhury I (19) Corbiere T (20) Dileepan T (21) Shen SS (22) Campbell KR (23) DeNardo DG (24) Stromnes IM

Science immunology

Schmiechen et al. found that variants of PDA that escaped following PD-L1 blockade showed epigenetic silencing of Tap1 expression, which induced loss of IFNγ-inducible MHC-I and reduced tumor cell killing mediated by CD8+ T cell. Escape variants also had an increased capacity for metastasis, which was promoted by Tregs and their suppressive effect on conventional CD4+ T cells. Combination strategies involving restoring IFNγ-inducible MHC-I, targeting Tregs, and enhancing Tconv enabled more effective cancer immunotherapy, suggesting potentially targetable mechanisms to enhance immunotherapy in PDA.

ABSTRACT: Mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer are poorly defined. We demonstrate that programmed death-ligand 1 immune checkpoint blockade promoted immune evasion by epigenetic Tap1 (transporter associated with antigen processing 1) silencing, increasing selection of metastatic tumor variants with defective interferon-_ (IFN-_)-inducible class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I) expression. Unleashing CD4 conventional T cells by regulatory T cell (T(reg) cell) depletion, transfer of tumor-reactive CD4 T cells, or anti-CTLA-4 prevented metastasis. Tumor-specific CD4 T cells adopted a TCF-1(+)SLAMF6(+) progenitor state in lymph nodes and differentiated in tumors. Anti-CTLA-4 increased intratumoral accumulation of CD4 T cells with stemness and tissue residency features, reduced metastasis, and induced gene signatures correlated with improved patient outcomes. MHC-I restoration with anti-CTLA-4 prolonged survival in murine models. In patient tumors, T(reg) cells and CD4 T cells colocalized, and abundance correlated with survival. These findings identify targetable mechanisms of immune evasion and metastasis in immunotherapy-resistant cancer.

Author Info: (1) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapo

Author Info: (1) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (2) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (3) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (4) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (5) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (6) Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. (7) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. (8) Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada. Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. (9) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (10) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (11) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (12) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (13) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (14) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (15) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (16) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (17) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (18) Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA. (19) Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA. (20) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (21) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. (22) Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada. Division of Oncology, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada. Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. (23) Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. (24) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Citation: Sci Immunol 2026 Jun 26 11:eadz4302 Epub06/26/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42361199

Tags:

Metabolic determinants of cancer immunotherapy outcomes identified by plasma profiling Spotlight 

(1) Suissa D (2) Fidelle M (3) Reich E (4) Pham TN (5) Thomas S (6) Bjšrk JR (7) Liu P (8) Zhao L (9) Kitaoka K (10) Piard E (11) Lebhar I (12) Tian AL (13) Thelemaque C (14) Alves Costa Silva C (15) Deutsch E (16) Loriot Y (17) Segata N (18) Piccinno G (19) Hospers GAP (20) Maleki Vareki S (21) Silverman MS (22) Lenehan JG (23) Bataille V (24) Boulate D (25) Kuznetsova T (26) Weersma RK (27) Messaoudene M (28) Durand S (29) van der Aalst CM (30) de Koning HJ (31) Schuler-Thurner B (32) de Vries IJM (33) Rafie E (34) Saliby RM (35) Machaalani M (36) Haferkamp S (37) Schilling B (38) Porcari S (39) Ciccarese C (40) Iacovelli R (41) Cremolini C (42) Choueiri TK (43) Elkrief A (44) Kroemer G (45) Heinzerling L (46) Chamoto K (47) Ianiro G (48) Routy B (49) Derosa L (50) Paragios N (51) Zitvogel L

Nature medicine

Suissa and Fidelle et al. performed targeted metabolomics to 4,336 plasma samples from 1,714 ICI-treated patients across 16 cohorts and trained an ML model that predicted 12‑month PFS, with histidine as a favorable marker and long-chain fatty acids and succinate associated with poor outcome. Histidine supplementation promoted mitochondrial FAO and regulated T cell exhaustion, enhancing ICI-induced antitumor immunity in fibrosarcoma and melanoma models. Histidine-rich diet was associated with favorable PFS in patients without dysbiosis-associated histidine catabolism, and fecal histidine levels inversely correlated with severe irAEs.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

(1) Suissa D (2) Fidelle M (3) Reich E (4) Pham TN (5) Thomas S (6) Bjšrk JR (7) Liu P (8) Zhao L (9) Kitaoka K (10) Piard E (11) Lebhar I (12) Tian AL (13) Thelemaque C (14) Alves Costa Silva C (15) Deutsch E (16) Loriot Y (17) Segata N (18) Piccinno G (19) Hospers GAP (20) Maleki Vareki S (21) Silverman MS (22) Lenehan JG (23) Bataille V (24) Boulate D (25) Kuznetsova T (26) Weersma RK (27) Messaoudene M (28) Durand S (29) van der Aalst CM (30) de Koning HJ (31) Schuler-Thurner B (32) de Vries IJM (33) Rafie E (34) Saliby RM (35) Machaalani M (36) Haferkamp S (37) Schilling B (38) Porcari S (39) Ciccarese C (40) Iacovelli R (41) Cremolini C (42) Choueiri TK (43) Elkrief A (44) Kroemer G (45) Heinzerling L (46) Chamoto K (47) Ianiro G (48) Routy B (49) Derosa L (50) Paragios N (51) Zitvogel L

Nature medicine

Suissa and Fidelle et al. performed targeted metabolomics to 4,336 plasma samples from 1,714 ICI-treated patients across 16 cohorts and trained an ML model that predicted 12‑month PFS, with histidine as a favorable marker and long-chain fatty acids and succinate associated with poor outcome. Histidine supplementation promoted mitochondrial FAO and regulated T cell exhaustion, enhancing ICI-induced antitumor immunity in fibrosarcoma and melanoma models. Histidine-rich diet was associated with favorable PFS in patients without dysbiosis-associated histidine catabolism, and fecal histidine levels inversely correlated with severe irAEs.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefit a subset of patients with advanced cancer, and the metabolic determinants of response remain unclear. Here, using targeted metabolomics and metagenomics, we profiled 4,336 plasma samples from 1,714 patients across five tumor types and 16 cohorts spanning Europe and North America, longitudinally sampled during five immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment modalities, including fecal microbiota transplantation. A multimodal machine-learning framework integrating 154 metabolites with clinical variables identified five metabolites, age, body mass index and renal function as predictors of 12-month progression-free survival. The model achieved areas under the curve of 0.88 in training and 0.73 in validation cohorts of 105 and 30 patients, respectively and generalized across seven external cohorts. Histidine was a favorable prognostic feature of survival, whereas long-chain fatty acids and succinate were negatively associated with outcome. Histidine supplementation enhanced antitumor immunity in mice. Histidine-rich diets improved progression-free survival in patients lacking dysbiotic microbiome signatures associated with histidine catabolism.

Author Info: (1) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (2) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay,

Author Info: (1) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (2) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (3) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (4) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (5) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (6) Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. (7) INSERM U1138 - Metabolism, Cancer & Immunity, ƒquipe LabellisŽe par la Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UniversitŽ Paris CitŽ, Sorbonne UniversitŽ, Paris, France. UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, INSERM US23 AMMICa, Metabolomic Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. (8) INSERM U1138 - Metabolism, Cancer & Immunity, ƒquipe LabellisŽe par la Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UniversitŽ Paris CitŽ, Sorbonne UniversitŽ, Paris, France. UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, INSERM US23 AMMICa, Metabolomic Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. (9) Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology (CCII), Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. (10) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (11) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (12) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (13) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. (14) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. Oncoclinicas&Co - Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil. Gonalo Moniz Institute, Fiocruz, Salvador, Brazil. Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil. (15) Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1355, RHU LySAIRI, Villejuif, France. (16) Department of Therapeutic Innovation and Early Trials (DITEP), INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. (17) Department of Computational, Cellular and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. (18) Department of Computational, Cellular and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. (19) Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. (20) Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Department of Oncology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. (21) Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Division of Infectious Diseases, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada. (22) Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. (23) Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK. Department of Dermatology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK. Department of Dermatology, Hemel Hempstead Hospital, West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hemel Hempstead, UK. (24) Department of Thoracic Surgery, H™pital-Nord-APHM, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. H™pital Marie Lannelongue, GHPSJ, Le Plessis-Robinson, France. (25) Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. (26) Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. (27) Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CRCHUM), Axe Cancer, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (28) INSERM U1138 - Metabolism, Cancer & Immunity, ƒquipe LabellisŽe par la Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UniversitŽ Paris CitŽ, Sorbonne UniversitŽ, Paris, France. UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, INSERM US23 AMMICa, Metabolomic Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. (29) Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (30) Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (31) Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Alexander-UniversitŠt Erlangen-NŸrnberg (FAU), UniversitŠtsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany. (32) Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. (33) Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CRCHUM), Axe Cancer, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Hemato-Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (34) Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. (35) Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (36) Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. (37) Department of Dermatology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. (38) Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Universitˆ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltˆ di Medicina e Chirurgia, Rome, Italy. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UOC CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. (39) Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Universitˆ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltˆ di Medicina e Chirurgia, Rome, Italy. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UOC Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. (40) Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Universitˆ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltˆ di Medicina e Chirurgia, Rome, Italy. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UOC Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. (41) Unit of Medical Oncology 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. (42) Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (43) Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CRCHUM), Axe Cancer, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Hemato-Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (44) INSERM U1138 - Metabolism, Cancer & Immunity, ƒquipe LabellisŽe par la Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UniversitŽ Paris CitŽ, Sorbonne UniversitŽ, Paris, France. UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, INSERM US23 AMMICa, Metabolomic Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Department of Biology, H™pital EuropŽen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France. (45) Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Alexander-UniversitŠt Erlangen-NŸrnberg (FAU), UniversitŠtsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. (46) Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology (CCII), Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Division of Cancer Immune Regulation, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology (CCII), Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. (47) Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Universitˆ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltˆ di Medicina e Chirurgia, Rome, Italy. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UOC CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. (48) Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CRCHUM), Axe Cancer, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Hemato-Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'UniversitŽ de MontrŽal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (49) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. (50) MICS Laboratory, CentraleSupŽlec, UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. nikos.paragios@centralesupelec.fr. TheraPanacea, Paris, France. nikos.paragios@centralesupelec.fr. (51) UniversitŽ Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, ClinicObiome, Inserm UMR1367, Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity for Cancer Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France. Laurence.zitvogel@gustaveroussy.fr.

Citation: Nat Med 2026 Jun 25 Epub06/25/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42350644

Tags:

Case of complete response to immunotherapy in MMR-deficient prostate cancer associated with NK-like and CD4+CD8+ T cells

Spotlight 

(1) Tsai AK (2) Lozada JR (3) Kennedy PR (4) Moline D (5) Pandey R (6) Lyons RC (7) Luo C (8) Wang R (9) Arafa AT (10) Femino EL (11) Zipkowitz S (12) Figueroa A (13) McCann PJ (14) Dallos MC (15) Elliott A (16) Murugan P (17) Felices M (18) Zorko NA (19) Konety BR (20) Dehm SM (21) Miller JS (22) Shen SS (23) Thompson EA (24) Sena LA (25) Yegnasubramanian S (26) Hwang J (27) Antonarakis ES

Cell reports. Medicine

In a patient with advanced prostate cancer, pembrolizumab resulted in CR and, followed by a radical prostatectomy, prevented recurrence out to 18mo. Tumor whole-exome NGS indicated dMMR/MSI-H and an extremely high TMB. Among PBMCs, CD56+ NK-like CD8+ T cells and CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) T cells were observed at high frequency relative to healthy donors, expressed cytotoxic/effector gene signatures and TEMRA phenotype, and clonally expanded after ICB. In other trials (prostate and dMMR/MSI-H cancers), CD56+CD8+ and DP T cells were found among TILs in ICB-treated patients, and DP T cell expansion was positively associated with patient response.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

(1) Tsai AK (2) Lozada JR (3) Kennedy PR (4) Moline D (5) Pandey R (6) Lyons RC (7) Luo C (8) Wang R (9) Arafa AT (10) Femino EL (11) Zipkowitz S (12) Figueroa A (13) McCann PJ (14) Dallos MC (15) Elliott A (16) Murugan P (17) Felices M (18) Zorko NA (19) Konety BR (20) Dehm SM (21) Miller JS (22) Shen SS (23) Thompson EA (24) Sena LA (25) Yegnasubramanian S (26) Hwang J (27) Antonarakis ES

Cell reports. Medicine

In a patient with advanced prostate cancer, pembrolizumab resulted in CR and, followed by a radical prostatectomy, prevented recurrence out to 18mo. Tumor whole-exome NGS indicated dMMR/MSI-H and an extremely high TMB. Among PBMCs, CD56+ NK-like CD8+ T cells and CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) T cells were observed at high frequency relative to healthy donors, expressed cytotoxic/effector gene signatures and TEMRA phenotype, and clonally expanded after ICB. In other trials (prostate and dMMR/MSI-H cancers), CD56+CD8+ and DP T cells were found among TILs in ICB-treated patients, and DP T cell expansion was positively associated with patient response.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ABSTRACT: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are rare in prostate cancer, occurring in 2%-4% of cases. These defects result in increased genomic instability and elevated tumor mutational burden (TMB), which can support responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here, we report a patient with locally advanced Gleason 5 + 5 = 10 prostatic adenocarcinoma harboring MSH2 and MSH6 genomic deletions with ultrahigh TMB (>250 mutations/megabase) in whom pembrolizumab resulted in a striking complete radiographic, pathologic, and molecular response. Using digital-spatial microscopy, single-cell RNA/T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, and multiplex cytometry, we identify atypical tumor-infiltrating T cells with natural killer-like phenotypes and CD4(+)CD8(+) (double-positive) lymphocytes. These clonal T cell populations expand preferentially following ICI and adopt terminally differentiated and cytotoxic profiles that may drive clinical response. Similar T cells are also present in diverse cancers and expand exclusively in ICI-responsive patients. These findings inform on the cellular mechanisms by which immunotherapies may mediate profound responses in patients with dMMR solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesot

Author Info: (1) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (2) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (3) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (4) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (5) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA. (6) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (7) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (8) Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. (9) Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (10) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (11) Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. (12) Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. (13) Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. (14) Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. (15) Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA. (16) Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (17) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (18) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (19) Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA. (20) Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (21) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (22) Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA. (23) Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. (24) Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. (25) Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. (26) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (27) Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: anton401@umn.edu.

Citation: Cell Rep Med 2026 Jun 26 102889 Epub06/26/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42361800

Tags:

Activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells prior to radiopharmaceutical therapy improves antitumor response Spotlight 

(1) Shim D (2) Mouton C (3) Moseman JE (4) Comas Rojas H (5) Jeon D (6) Idrissou MB (7) Hernandez R (8) Weichert JP (9) McNeel DG

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer | Free PMC Article

Shim et al. investigated how the timing of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell activation shaped responses to radiopharmaceutical therapy with ⁹⁰Y-NM600 (RPT) in E.G7-OVA and TRAMP-C1 tumor models. Low-dose RPT led to an increase in CD8+ T cell infiltration, but failed to enrich antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Ex vivo- or (with vaccination) in vivo-activated, but not naive, OT-I cells given prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and expanded antigen-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells in a type I IFN-dependent, cGAS–STING-independent manner. In the TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer model, an AR-encoding DNA vaccine given prior to RPT enhanced tumor control.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

(1) Shim D (2) Mouton C (3) Moseman JE (4) Comas Rojas H (5) Jeon D (6) Idrissou MB (7) Hernandez R (8) Weichert JP (9) McNeel DG

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer | Free PMC Article

Shim et al. investigated how the timing of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell activation shaped responses to radiopharmaceutical therapy with ⁹⁰Y-NM600 (RPT) in E.G7-OVA and TRAMP-C1 tumor models. Low-dose RPT led to an increase in CD8+ T cell infiltration, but failed to enrich antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Ex vivo- or (with vaccination) in vivo-activated, but not naive, OT-I cells given prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and expanded antigen-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells in a type I IFN-dependent, cGAS–STING-independent manner. In the TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer model, an AR-encoding DNA vaccine given prior to RPT enhanced tumor control.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

BACKGROUND: Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) delivers radiation systemically, enabling the treatment of metastatic cancers. Beyond killing tumor cells, RPT can modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. With RPTs and immunotherapies already approved or in development for prostate cancer, many preclinical and clinical studies are evaluating their use in combination. However, due to the radiosensitivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, further studies are needed to determine the effects of RPT on these cells to better inform the sequence of immunotherapies that activate T cells when given with RPT. METHODS: E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice received na•ve or activated OT-I CD8+T cells prior to or following the administration of RPT using (90)Y-NM600. Changes in tumor growth were monitored, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were evaluated for phenotypic and functional markers. The murine prostate tumor model TRAMP-C1 was used to evaluate this approach using tumor antigen-specific vaccination with (90)Y-NM600. RESULTS: Antitumor efficacy was improved if OT-I CD8+T cells were present and activated prior to (90)Y-NM600 administration than if the cells were delivered after RPT. Similarly, in vivo activation of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+T cells, using ovalbumin (OVA)-specific vaccination, prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and increased the frequency of tumor-infiltrating OVA(257-264)-specific CD8+T cells with effector memory phenotype and effector molecule production. Blockade of type I interferon, but not the upstream inhibition of stimulator of interferon genes, abrogated tumor growth delay resulting from the combination treatment. Tumor antigen-specific vaccination prior to (90)Y-NM600 administration similarly improved antitumor outcomes in the TRAMP-C1 tumor model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that tumor-specific CD8+T cells need to be present and activated prior to RPT to enhance antitumor outcomes. This study highlights the importance of considering the effects of RPT on tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells when combining other T-cell activating therapies with RPT, as they may similarly display sequence-dependent antitumor outcomes.

Author Info: (1) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (2) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (3) University of Wisconsin

Author Info: (1) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (2) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (3) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (4) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (5) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (6) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (7) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (8) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (9) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.

Citation: J Immunother Cancer 2026 Jun 19 14: Epub06/19/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42320982

Tags:

Neutrophil regulation of immunotherapy for cancer is controlled by type II interferon Featured  

(1) Pei S (2) Pan Y (3) Liang H (4) Lei L (5) Lin Q (6) Mi J (7) Ravetch JV (8) Soehnlein O (9) Karlsson MCI

Immunity

Pei et al. found that the IFNγ produced in tumors during treatment with various immunotherapies induced PD-L1 expression by neutrophils and drove them towards an aged/immunosuppressive phenotype, which contributed to treatment resistance. This could be alleviated by eliminating neutrophils or disrupting type II IFN signaling or PD-L1 expression, which shifted neutrophil polarization to a more pro-inflammatory state. The accumulation of aged, PD-L1+ neutrophils was also evident in data from immunotherapy-treated human tumors, suggesting possible avenues for intervention to improve immunotherapy responses.

(1) Pei S (2) Pan Y (3) Liang H (4) Lei L (5) Lin Q (6) Mi J (7) Ravetch JV (8) Soehnlein O (9) Karlsson MCI

Immunity

Pei et al. found that the IFNγ produced in tumors during treatment with various immunotherapies induced PD-L1 expression by neutrophils and drove them towards an aged/immunosuppressive phenotype, which contributed to treatment resistance. This could be alleviated by eliminating neutrophils or disrupting type II IFN signaling or PD-L1 expression, which shifted neutrophil polarization to a more pro-inflammatory state. The accumulation of aged, PD-L1+ neutrophils was also evident in data from immunotherapy-treated human tumors, suggesting possible avenues for intervention to improve immunotherapy responses.

ABSTRACT: Tumor resistance to immunotherapy is driven by several mechanisms, including those imposed by myeloid populations. Neutrophils are prominent within this landscape and display functional heterogeneity. Here, we investigated the contextual role of neutrophils, and using neutropenic mice, we found that the dominating function was to block the response when targeting T cells or myeloid cells. We found that neutrophils upregulated programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in response to the treatment and, using this as a target, depleted this population. The upregulation of PD-L1 was dependent on interferon-γ (IFN-γ) produced by cytotoxic lymphocytes. Specific genetic deletion of cd274 or Ifngr1 on neutrophils showed that this was cell intrinsic. Moreover, in the absence of the capacity for specific IFN-γ-driven suppression, neutrophils changed their phenotype to support immunotherapy. Thus, we find that the type II interferon, IFN-γ, is key in determining whether neutrophils will support or block immunotherapy for cancer.

Author Info: (1) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (2) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Sto

Author Info: (1) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (2) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (3) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (4) Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (5) Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. (6) Department of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. (7) Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. (8) University of Munster, Institute of Experimental Pathology, Munster, Germany. (9) Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: mikael.karlsson@ki.se.

Citation: Immunity 2026 Jun 15 Epub06/15/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42296966

Tags:

Tumor transcriptional state predicts survival in immune-checkpoint-blockade-treated glioblastoma Spotlight 

(1) Ghannam JY (2) Bryan J (3) Weiss J (4) Kovarsky D (5) Merrell D (6) Messer C (7) Schlueter-Kuck K (8) Fell GG (9) Lim-Fat MJ (10) Youssef G (11) Rahman R (12) Qin L (13) Young GS (14) Janes JT 3rd (15) Van Orden M (16) Pfaff KL (17) Gans A (18) Lin ES (19) Huang RY (20) Danysh BP (21) Parida L (22) Li S (23) Wen PY (24) Chiocca EA (25) Neuberg D (26) Ligon KL (27) Tirosh I (28) Reardon DA (29) Getz G (30) Wu CJ

Nature cancer

Using bulk DNA/RNA sequencing and single-nucleus RNAseq, Ghannam et al. profiled 181 ICB-treated glioblastomas, benchmarking against standard-of-care cohorts, to define genomic correlates of ICB response. At baseline, an mesenchymal (MES) transcriptional subtype with high HLA class I expression and increased T cell infiltration was predictive of improved survival after ICB, but not chemoradiation, whereas non-MES-linked lesions were associated with worse ICB outcomes. TMB was not predictive of outcomes, and a longitudinal analysis showed ICB selected for subclones with non-MES features as a trajectory of acquired ICB resistance in GBM.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

(1) Ghannam JY (2) Bryan J (3) Weiss J (4) Kovarsky D (5) Merrell D (6) Messer C (7) Schlueter-Kuck K (8) Fell GG (9) Lim-Fat MJ (10) Youssef G (11) Rahman R (12) Qin L (13) Young GS (14) Janes JT 3rd (15) Van Orden M (16) Pfaff KL (17) Gans A (18) Lin ES (19) Huang RY (20) Danysh BP (21) Parida L (22) Li S (23) Wen PY (24) Chiocca EA (25) Neuberg D (26) Ligon KL (27) Tirosh I (28) Reardon DA (29) Getz G (30) Wu CJ

Nature cancer

Using bulk DNA/RNA sequencing and single-nucleus RNAseq, Ghannam et al. profiled 181 ICB-treated glioblastomas, benchmarking against standard-of-care cohorts, to define genomic correlates of ICB response. At baseline, an mesenchymal (MES) transcriptional subtype with high HLA class I expression and increased T cell infiltration was predictive of improved survival after ICB, but not chemoradiation, whereas non-MES-linked lesions were associated with worse ICB outcomes. TMB was not predictive of outcomes, and a longitudinal analysis showed ICB selected for subclones with non-MES features as a trajectory of acquired ICB resistance in GBM.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: The determinants of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response in glioblastoma (GBM) with wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase remain poorly understood. Here we profiled 181 ICB-treated GBM cases using bulk DNA sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing and single-nucleus RNA sequencing to investigate the genomic features associated with ICB outcomes. Baseline tumor transcriptional subtype was predictive of overall survival following ICB, with mesenchymal (MES) GBM associated with improved outcomes to ICB but not standard chemoradiation. Non-MES-associated genetic lesions, including those in PDGFRA and CDKN2A, were associated with worse survival following ICB but not standard therapy. Tumor mutational burden was not predictive of outcomes. Survival was associated with pre-ICB enrichment for MES-like malignant cells, marked by high human leukocyte antigen class I expression and greater T cell infiltration. Paired tumor analyses linked ICB exposure to outgrowth of subclones harboring lesions associated with non-MES subtypes, supporting MES-to-non-MES transition as a common trajectory of acquired resistance to ICB, distinct from standard chemoradiation.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Author Info: (1) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Harvard/MIT MD-PhD Program and Harvard Immunology PhD Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (2) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (3) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. (4) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (5) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. (6) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. (7) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. (8) Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (9) Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (10) Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Center for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (11) Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (12) Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (13) Departments of Radiology, Mass General Brigham, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (14) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (15) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (16) Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (17) Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (18) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (19) Departments of Radiology, Mass General Brigham, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. (20) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. (21) IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA. (22) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (23) Center for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (24) Center for Tumors of the Nervous System, Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute & Department of Neurosurgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA. (25) Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (26) Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (27) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (28) Center for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. (29) Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. (30) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. catherine_wu@dfci.harvard.edu. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. catherine_wu@dfci.harvard.edu. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. catherine_wu@dfci.harvard.edu.

Citation: Nat Cancer 2026 Jun 3 Epub06/03/2026

Link to PUBMED: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/42237038

Tags:
Close Modal

Subscribe to our mailing list

GDPR Marketing Permissions

The Fritsch Foundation/ACIR.org will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to send you a weekly digest on cance immunotherapy. Click below to confirm that you want to receive the weekly digest by:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at contact@acir.org. We will treat your information with respect and will never share it with any third-parties. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.