(1) Barrett AM (2) Britton ZT (3) Carrasco RA (4) Breen S (5) Broggi MAS (6) Hatke A (7) Clark B (8) Yang C (9) Phipps S (10) Ortiz L (11) Janocha B (12) Zanvit P (13) Giraldo NA (14) Martin PL (15) Lapointe JM (16) Harder N (17) Cornish GH (18) Attili BNNR (19) Mazor Y (20) Damschroder M (21) Cobbold M (22) Moody G (23) Bosco EE
Barrett et al designed a CLDN18.2 CAR T cell product incorporating a CLDN18.2 binding domain (selected on the basis of cytotoxicity, despite its low affinity), a dnTGFβ receptor, and a shortened expansion process to enhance efficacy in solid tumors. A CAR containing CD28 was safe and effective in a mouse xenograft model, while 4-1BB led to severe on-target/off-tumor toxicity. TGFβ armoring promoted complete tumor regression and sustained IFNγ responses, and short manufacturing promoted a TCM phenotype and improved cytotoxicity upon serial restimulation. The final product demonstrated efficacy across six PDX models with varying CLDN18.2 and TGFβ levels.
Contributed by Morgan Janes
(1) Barrett AM (2) Britton ZT (3) Carrasco RA (4) Breen S (5) Broggi MAS (6) Hatke A (7) Clark B (8) Yang C (9) Phipps S (10) Ortiz L (11) Janocha B (12) Zanvit P (13) Giraldo NA (14) Martin PL (15) Lapointe JM (16) Harder N (17) Cornish GH (18) Attili BNNR (19) Mazor Y (20) Damschroder M (21) Cobbold M (22) Moody G (23) Bosco EE
Barrett et al designed a CLDN18.2 CAR T cell product incorporating a CLDN18.2 binding domain (selected on the basis of cytotoxicity, despite its low affinity), a dnTGFβ receptor, and a shortened expansion process to enhance efficacy in solid tumors. A CAR containing CD28 was safe and effective in a mouse xenograft model, while 4-1BB led to severe on-target/off-tumor toxicity. TGFβ armoring promoted complete tumor regression and sustained IFNγ responses, and short manufacturing promoted a TCM phenotype and improved cytotoxicity upon serial restimulation. The final product demonstrated efficacy across six PDX models with varying CLDN18.2 and TGFβ levels.
Contributed by Morgan Janes
Purpose: CLDN18.2 is a surface membrane protein crucial for maintaining tight junctions in gastric mucosal cells and is highly expressed in gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers. Thus, CLDN18.2 is suited for exploration as a clinical target for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in these indications. Although CAR-T therapies show promise, a challenge faced in their development for solid tumors is the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, often characterized by the presence of immune and stromal cells secreting high levels of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). Addition of TGF-β armoring can potentially expand CAR-T activity in solid tumors. We report on the preclinical development of a CLDN18.2-targeting CAR-T showing effectiveness in CLDN18.2-positive gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic tumor models.
Experimental design: The lead lentivirus product contains a unique single-chain variable fragment, CD28 and CD3z costimulatory and signaling domains, and dominant negative TGF-β receptor armoring, enhancing targeting and safety and counteracting suppression. We developed a shortened cell manufacturing process to enhance the potency of the final product, AZD6422.
Results: AZD6422 exhibited significant antitumor activity and tolerability in multiple patient-derived tumor xenograft models with various CLDN18.2 and TGF-β levels, as determined by immunohistochemistry. Efficacy of armored CAR-Ts in tumor models with elevated TGF-β was increased in vitro and in vivo. In vitro restimulation assays established greater persistence and cytolytic function of AZD6422 compared with a traditionally manufactured CAR-T.
Conclusions: AZD6422 was safe and efficacious in patient-derived, CLDN18.2-positive murine models of gastrointestinal cancers. Our data support further clinical development of AZD6422 for patients with these cancers.
Author Info: (1) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (2) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (3) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, M
Author Info: (1) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (2) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (3) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (4) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (5) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (6) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (7) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (8) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States. (9) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (10) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (11) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (12) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (13) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (14) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States. (15) AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), Cambridge, United Kingdom. (16) AstraZeneca (United States), Munich, Germany. (17) AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), Cambridge, United Kingdom. (18) AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), Cambridge, United Kingdom. (19) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, United States. (20) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (21) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (22) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States. (23) AstraZeneca (United States), Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
Citation: Clin Cancer Res 2024 Sep 25 Epub09/25/2024