Using a combination of traceable neoantigen-encoding, fluorescently tagged lentiviruses to induce sarcomagenesis following i.m. injection in GEM mice, tamoxifen-inducible neoantigen deletion, and patience to follow mouse models for many months, Cheung and Hunt et al. took on the problem of understanding immunoediting early after tumor initiation. Multi-clonal initiating events led to the presence of antigen-negative subclones, even in the absence of T cell editing, and the ability (or lack thereof) of neoantigen-targeting T cells to eliminate antigen-negative bystander cells through an IFNγ-dependent mechanism early (day 5-10 during the peak initial T cell response) after sarcomagenesis determined escape or elimination.
Contributed by Ed Fritsch
ABSTRACT: T cells edit tumors by eliminating neoantigen-expressing tumor cells. Yet, how and when this is achieved remains uncertain. Using a murine sarcoma model with fluorescent neoantigens, we found that tumors developed later and in fewer T cell-sufficient mice (_53% penetrance) than T cell-deficient mice (_100%). With T cells, all emergent tumor cells had silenced neoantigens, but neoantigen-negative tumor cells were also present in every T cell-deficient mouse. This suggested silencing was necessary but not sufficient for outgrowth. Genetic removal of neoantigens restored tumor penetrance if implemented on day 5 post-tumor initiation, but not day 10, because CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells infiltrated the tissue and eliminated most neoantigen-positive and -negative tumor cells within 8 days. Single-cell analyses on day-7 tumors showed oncogenic changes including increased proliferation and T cell-dependent upregulation of the IFN_-response gene Cd274 (PD-L1). T cell-depletion rescued both neoantigen-positive and -negative cells, while IFN_ blockade rescued only negative cells. This shows that T cells efficiently edit sarcomas of neoantigens and prevent early tumors via IFN_-independent and IFN_-dependent (bystander) mechanisms.