Journal Articles

A radiopharmaceutical enhances CAR T cells against radio-sensitive and radio-resistant neuroblastoma by tumor sensitization and TME remodeling Spotlight 

Rodriguez and Edinger et al. showed that pre-treatment with VLA-4-targeted, low-dose radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) using [67Cu] Cu-LLP2A enhanced GD2 or B7-H3 CAR T cell efficacy, resulting in significant tumor regression in xenogeneic, preclinical neuroblastoma models. The mechanism of action varied with tumor radiosensitivity. In radiosensitive tumors, RPT was directly tumoricidal and enhanced CAR T cell efficacy via TNF-α, leading to paracrine T cell activation. In radioresistant tumors, RPT remodeled the TIME by decreasing the number of M2-like TAMs and stimulating the formation of enriched cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clusters.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

Rodriguez and Edinger et al. showed that pre-treatment with VLA-4-targeted, low-dose radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) using [67Cu] Cu-LLP2A enhanced GD2 or B7-H3 CAR T cell efficacy, resulting in significant tumor regression in xenogeneic, preclinical neuroblastoma models. The mechanism of action varied with tumor radiosensitivity. In radiosensitive tumors, RPT was directly tumoricidal and enhanced CAR T cell efficacy via TNF-α, leading to paracrine T cell activation. In radioresistant tumors, RPT remodeled the TIME by decreasing the number of M2-like TAMs and stimulating the formation of enriched cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clusters.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has limited efficacy against solid tumors such as neuroblastoma (NB). Key obstacles include extensive tumor burden and the presence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). We employ targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) using [(67)Cu]Cu-LLP2A and show that it potentiated the anti-tumor activity of CAR T cells in radio-sensitive and radio-resistant NB models via distinct mechanisms. In radio-sensitive NB, RPT is directly tumoricidal while also enhancing CAR T cell efficacy through pro-immune pathways, most notably via the TNF-_ pathway, leading to paracrine activation of T cells. In radio-resistant NB, RPT improves CAR T cells by remodeling the myeloid compartment in the TME and increasing the formation of immunological niches of cytotoxic CD8(+) GZMB(+) and CD4(+) GZMB(+) CAR T cells. While neither treatment modality alone can effectively treat NB, the combination of VLA-4-targeted RPT and GD2 or B7-H3 CAR T cells augments anti-tumor efficacy, resulting in marked tumor regression in preclinical NB models.

Author Info: (1) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (2) Department of Radiation Oncology, Univer

Author Info: (1) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (2) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (3) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (4) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (5) Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (6) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (7) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (8) Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (9) Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (10) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (11) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (12) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (13) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (14) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (15) Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (16) Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (17) Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (18) Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (19) Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. (20) Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. (21) Departments of Chemistry and Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. (22) Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: freddy.escorcia@gmail.com. (23) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: patelr20@upmc.edu. (24) Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: hongharosa.nguyen@nih.gov.

Activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells prior to radiopharmaceutical therapy improves antitumor response Spotlight 

Shim et al. investigated how the timing of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell activation shaped responses to radiopharmaceutical therapy with ⁹⁰Y-NM600 (RPT) in E.G7-OVA and TRAMP-C1 tumor models. Low-dose RPT led to an increase in CD8+ T cell infiltration, but failed to enrich antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Ex vivo- or (with vaccination) in vivo-activated, but not naive, OT-I cells given prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and expanded antigen-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells in a type I IFN-dependent, cGAS–STING-independent manner. In the TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer model, an AR-encoding DNA vaccine given prior to RPT enhanced tumor control.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Shim et al. investigated how the timing of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell activation shaped responses to radiopharmaceutical therapy with ⁹⁰Y-NM600 (RPT) in E.G7-OVA and TRAMP-C1 tumor models. Low-dose RPT led to an increase in CD8+ T cell infiltration, but failed to enrich antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Ex vivo- or (with vaccination) in vivo-activated, but not naive, OT-I cells given prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and expanded antigen-specific effector memory CD8+ T cells in a type I IFN-dependent, cGAS–STING-independent manner. In the TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer model, an AR-encoding DNA vaccine given prior to RPT enhanced tumor control.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

BACKGROUND: Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) delivers radiation systemically, enabling the treatment of metastatic cancers. Beyond killing tumor cells, RPT can modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. With RPTs and immunotherapies already approved or in development for prostate cancer, many preclinical and clinical studies are evaluating their use in combination. However, due to the radiosensitivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, further studies are needed to determine the effects of RPT on these cells to better inform the sequence of immunotherapies that activate T cells when given with RPT. METHODS: E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice received na•ve or activated OT-I CD8+T cells prior to or following the administration of RPT using (90)Y-NM600. Changes in tumor growth were monitored, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were evaluated for phenotypic and functional markers. The murine prostate tumor model TRAMP-C1 was used to evaluate this approach using tumor antigen-specific vaccination with (90)Y-NM600. RESULTS: Antitumor efficacy was improved if OT-I CD8+T cells were present and activated prior to (90)Y-NM600 administration than if the cells were delivered after RPT. Similarly, in vivo activation of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+T cells, using ovalbumin (OVA)-specific vaccination, prior to RPT slowed tumor growth and increased the frequency of tumor-infiltrating OVA(257-264)-specific CD8+T cells with effector memory phenotype and effector molecule production. Blockade of type I interferon, but not the upstream inhibition of stimulator of interferon genes, abrogated tumor growth delay resulting from the combination treatment. Tumor antigen-specific vaccination prior to (90)Y-NM600 administration similarly improved antitumor outcomes in the TRAMP-C1 tumor model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that tumor-specific CD8+T cells need to be present and activated prior to RPT to enhance antitumor outcomes. This study highlights the importance of considering the effects of RPT on tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells when combining other T-cell activating therapies with RPT, as they may similarly display sequence-dependent antitumor outcomes.

Author Info: (1) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (2) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (3) University of Wisconsin

Author Info: (1) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (2) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (3) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (4) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (5) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (6) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (7) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (8) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. (9) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.

Tumor irradiation promotes antigen dressing of dendritic cells to enhance CAR T cell persistence and efficacy in lung metastases Spotlight 

Navarre, Ishibashi, and Nair et al. showed that focal 8 Gy tumor irradiation in a syngeneic metastatic lung adenocarcinoma model enhanced CAR T cell persistence and efficacy in a DC-dependent manner. Irradiation conditioned tumor cells for trogocytic antigen transfer onto DCs and macrophages, but only DCs engaged CAR T cells through the chimeric receptor, sustaining their activity. DC depletion abolished sustained CAR T cells and long-term tumor control. CAR T cell expansion was restricted to irradiated tumors, and not adjacent antigen-expressing normal lung tissue, indicating spatially restricted DC–CAR T cell engagement.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Navarre, Ishibashi, and Nair et al. showed that focal 8 Gy tumor irradiation in a syngeneic metastatic lung adenocarcinoma model enhanced CAR T cell persistence and efficacy in a DC-dependent manner. Irradiation conditioned tumor cells for trogocytic antigen transfer onto DCs and macrophages, but only DCs engaged CAR T cells through the chimeric receptor, sustaining their activity. DC depletion abolished sustained CAR T cells and long-term tumor control. CAR T cell expansion was restricted to irradiated tumors, and not adjacent antigen-expressing normal lung tissue, indicating spatially restricted DC–CAR T cell engagement.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Metastatic solid tumors remain the principal cause of cancer mortality worldwide. High tumor burden impairs responses to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, yet off-tumor toxicity limits the doses that can be safely delivered. Strategies to selectively enhance CAR T cell activity at tumor sites could widen the therapeutic window. Using syngeneic models of extensive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and melanoma, we show that 8_Gy of tumor irradiation significantly enhanced CAR T cell persistence in a manner critically dependent on dendritic cells (DCs). Irradiation promoted trogocytic antigen dressing of tumor antigens onto DCs, which then expanded CAR T cells through the chimeric receptor. Without functional DCs, irradiation failed to sustain CAR T cell persistence and tumors relapsed. Irradiation increased CAR T cell numbers within tumors but not in adjacent normal lung tissue that also expressed target antigen, conferring robust control of tumor without increased toxicity. These data define a mechanistic basis and rationale for combining radiotherapy with CAR T cell therapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Department

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA. (2) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. (3) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (4) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (5) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (6) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (7) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (8) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (9) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (10) Department of Medicine, Immunology Program, Gene Transfer and Somatic Cell Engineering Laboratory, Center for Cell Engineering and Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Columbia Initiative in Cell Engineering and Therapy (CICET), Cancer Cell Therapy Initiative in the Vagelos Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. (11) Department of Medicine, Immunology Program, Gene Transfer and Somatic Cell Engineering Laboratory, Center for Cell Engineering and Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. (12) Department of Medicine, Immunology Program, Gene Transfer and Somatic Cell Engineering Laboratory, Center for Cell Engineering and Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC2180) 'Image-guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies', University Children's Hospital TŸbingen, TŸbingen, Germany. (13) Department of Medicine, Immunology Program, Gene Transfer and Somatic Cell Engineering Laboratory, Center for Cell Engineering and Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Columbia Initiative in Cell Engineering and Therapy (CICET), Cancer Cell Therapy Initiative in the Vagelos Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. (14) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (15) Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. (16) Department of Medicine-Division of Hematology and Oncology, Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. (17) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (18) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. (19) Columbia Initiative in Cell Engineering and Therapy (CICET), Cancer Cell Therapy Initiative in the Vagelos Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. (20) Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. jalal.ahmed@mountsinai.org. Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. jalal.ahmed@mountsinai.org.

Radiotherapy synergizes with an inducible AAV-based immunotherapy platform to program local and systemic antitumor immunity

Spotlight 

Marco et al. sought to expand the utility of immunizing radiation (IR) therapy by intratumorally delivering agents to remodel the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). After observing that IR enhanced transduction of tumor cells by adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), a known durable and safe gene delivery system, AAVs were engineered to express IL-12 under the control of a type I interferon promoter (as IFN-I is highly induced in tumors by IR). Tumor irradiation followed rapidly by AAV injection led to enhanced local IL-12 expression, remodeled the TIME, and induced robust synergistic tumor elimination in multiple models, primarily through FAS-FASL cytotoxicity.

Contributed by Ed Fritsch

Marco et al. sought to expand the utility of immunizing radiation (IR) therapy by intratumorally delivering agents to remodel the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). After observing that IR enhanced transduction of tumor cells by adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), a known durable and safe gene delivery system, AAVs were engineered to express IL-12 under the control of a type I interferon promoter (as IFN-I is highly induced in tumors by IR). Tumor irradiation followed rapidly by AAV injection led to enhanced local IL-12 expression, remodeled the TIME, and induced robust synergistic tumor elimination in multiple models, primarily through FAS-FASL cytotoxicity.

Contributed by Ed Fritsch

ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy (RT) can prime the immune system against cancer but often fails to generate effective antitumor responses due to concomitant induction of immunosuppressive factors. To overcome this limitation, we built upon the observation that RT enhances adeno-associated vectors (AAVs) tumor transduction through the epigenetic modification of vector episomes. We designed an AAV-based platform to deliver immunostimulatory cytokines through an interferon (IFN)-inducible promoter that allows for spatial control of transgene expression into irradiated tumors. As opposed to a constitutive system, local delivery of a vector encoding for inducible IL-12 (AAV-iIL12) achieves an efficient production of the cytokine without significant toxicity. Combination of RT and AAV-iIL12 generates a highly immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment (TME) leading to robust local and systemic antitumor responses in an IFNγ- and FAS-dependent manner, able to overcome common immune-evasion mechanisms. Our work shows that radiation coupled with AAV-based immune-gene delivery is an efficient and safe approach to treat cancer.

Author Info:

Author Info:

Combined targeted and epigenetic-based therapy enhances antitumor immunity by stabilizing GATA6-dependent MHCI expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Spotlight 

Peng, Yang, Antonopoulou, et al. found that in human PDAC, high expression of GATA6 correlated with increased MHC-I expression, immune cell infiltration, and interactions with CD8+ T cells. In murine tumor lines, MEK inhibition (MEKi) further increased MHC-I expression in GATA6high tumor cells, leading to enhanced T cell cytotoxicity against them, while GATA6 knockout or degradation abrogated this effect. In vivo, high GATA6 expression was required for MEKi-induced tumor control, but long-term treatment reduced GATA6+ cells and increased immunosuppressive EMT, which could be overcome by combining MEKi with HDAC inhibitors.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Peng, Yang, Antonopoulou, et al. found that in human PDAC, high expression of GATA6 correlated with increased MHC-I expression, immune cell infiltration, and interactions with CD8+ T cells. In murine tumor lines, MEK inhibition (MEKi) further increased MHC-I expression in GATA6high tumor cells, leading to enhanced T cell cytotoxicity against them, while GATA6 knockout or degradation abrogated this effect. In vivo, high GATA6 expression was required for MEKi-induced tumor control, but long-term treatment reduced GATA6+ cells and increased immunosuppressive EMT, which could be overcome by combining MEKi with HDAC inhibitors.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: GATA6 promotes epithelial phenotypes and limits epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here we show that GATA6 defines a tumor cell state that induces MHCI expression and anti-tumor cytotoxicity upon therapy. In human PDAC, GATA6 expression correlates with immune cell infiltration, and spatial analysis reveals interaction between GATA6(+) tumor cells and CD8(+) T cells. In murine PDAC, MEK inhibition (MEKi) enriches antigenicity-related gene sets in GATA6(high) cells, while GATA6 knockout or degradation impairs MEKi-induced MHCI upregulation. High-GATA6 tumors respond to MEKi with increased MHCI, enhancing T-cell cytotoxicity, whereas GATA6 loss abolishes this effect. Treatment-induced EMT reduces GATA6(+) populations and MHCI expression, which is restored by combining MEKi with HDAC inhibitors, enhancing GATA6(+) tumor cells, MHCI, CD8(+) T cell infiltration, tumor suppression, and survival. These findings suggest that therapeutic strategies promoting a GATA6-driven tumor cell state improve immune recognition of PDAC cells and potentiate anti-tumor cytotoxic effects.

Author Info: (1) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University

Author Info: (1) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. (2) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (3) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (4) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (5) Institute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. (6) Institute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. (7) Institute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. (8) Division Immune Regulation in Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. (9) Division Immune Regulation in Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. (10) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (11) Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen UniversitŠt MŸnchen, Munich, Germany. (12) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (13) Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen UniversitŠt MŸnchen, Munich, Germany. (14) German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. (15) German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. (16) Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany. (17) Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany. (18) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (19) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (20) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (21) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (22) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. (23) German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany. School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. (24) Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. (25) ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. (26) EPO - Experimental Pharmacology and Oncology GmbH, Berlin, Germany. (27) Institute of Immunology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. (28) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. f.cheung@dkfz-heidelberg.de. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. f.cheung@dkfz-heidelberg.de. Spatiotemporal tumor heterogeneity, DKTK, partner site Essen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. f.cheung@dkfz-heidelberg.de. (29) Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy (BIT) and Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. j.siveke@dkfz.de. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, a partnership between German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. j.siveke@dkfz.de. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, Campus Essen, Essen, Germany. j.siveke@dkfz.de.

Meningeal blood vessel blockage enhances anti-glioblastoma immunity Spotlight 

Gao, Peng, Cheng, Zhang, et al. found that surgically blocking the meningeal blood vessel hindered GBM progression in mice by restricting access to the dura mater by circulation-derived border-associated macrophages (cBAM). This reduced competition for CSF-1 and increasing expansion of resident BAMs (rBAMs), which showed enhanced antigen presentation and activation of antitumor T cells, dependent on their high expression of FcRn. The addition of CSF-1 or anti-PD-1 enhanced this antitumor effect. In patient samples, rBAM abundance correlated with increased intratumoral T cell activity and better survival outcomes.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Gao, Peng, Cheng, Zhang, et al. found that surgically blocking the meningeal blood vessel hindered GBM progression in mice by restricting access to the dura mater by circulation-derived border-associated macrophages (cBAM). This reduced competition for CSF-1 and increasing expansion of resident BAMs (rBAMs), which showed enhanced antigen presentation and activation of antitumor T cells, dependent on their high expression of FcRn. The addition of CSF-1 or anti-PD-1 enhanced this antitumor effect. In patient samples, rBAM abundance correlated with increased intratumoral T cell activity and better survival outcomes.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: The dura mater, the outermost meningeal layer that samples and presents central nervous system (CNS)-derived antigens, is a pivotal interface for CNS immunosurveillance. Here, we show that meningeal blood vessel blockage effectively suppresses glioblastoma (GBM) progression in murine models. Single-cell profiling of dura reveals a resident border-associated macrophage (rBAM) subset characterized by high neonatal Fc receptor expression, which endows rBAMs with superior capacity for presenting tumor antigens and activating CNS-patrolling T cells. Meningeal blood vessel blockage preserves dural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-1 levels by restricting circulation-derived BAM (cBAM) and expands the rBAM pool, thereby enhancing T cell activation at the dura interface and amplifying intratumoral cytotoxic T cell responses. Clinically, rBAM abundance positively correlates with GBM patient survival. Our findings show that the dura is a critical regulator of anti-tumor immunity in CNS cancers and propose that meningeal blood vessel blockage may be a surgical strategy to potentiate GBM immunotherapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function a

Author Info: (1) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (2) Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences (CLS), School of Life Sciences, Peking University (PKU), Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Peking University, Beijing, China. (3) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (4) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (5) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (6) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China. (7) Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences (CLS), School of Life Sciences, Peking University (PKU), Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Peking University, Beijing, China. (8) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (9) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (10) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (11) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (12) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (13) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (14) Department of Scientific Research Section, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. (15) National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Antibody Techniques, Department of Cell Biology, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Human Functional Genomics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, Jiangsu, China. (16) Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences (CLS), School of Life Sciences, Peking University (PKU), Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Peking University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: fbai@pku.edu.cn. (17) Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: zhangnu2@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

DCC-2036 induces repolarization of TAMs to M1 type and enhances CD8+ T cell immunity in TNBC

Spotlight 

Liang and Zeng et al. showed that small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor DCC-2036 repolarized TAMs from an “M2” to an “M1” phenotype and enhanced antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity in a 4T1 TNBC tumor model. DCC-2036 selectively targeted hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK) and reprogrammed TAM metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis via the HCK-AKT/mTOR-GS-HIF1α axis. DCC-2036-mediated TAM repolarization to an M1 phenotype, decreased IL-10 production and secretion, enhanced antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity, and sensitized 4T1 tumors to immune checkpoint therapy.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Liang and Zeng et al. showed that small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor DCC-2036 repolarized TAMs from an “M2” to an “M1” phenotype and enhanced antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity in a 4T1 TNBC tumor model. DCC-2036 selectively targeted hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK) and reprogrammed TAM metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis via the HCK-AKT/mTOR-GS-HIF1α axis. DCC-2036-mediated TAM repolarization to an M1 phenotype, decreased IL-10 production and secretion, enhanced antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity, and sensitized 4T1 tumors to immune checkpoint therapy.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Therapies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) still need innovative approaches, while repolarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may offer a breakthrough in the targeted therapy and immunotherapy of TNBC. In this study, our group found that the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor DCC-2036 could induce repolarization of TAMs from M2 to M1 type and enhance anti-tumor CD8+ T cell immunity in TNBC. Mechanistically, targeting inhibition of the non-receptor tyrosine kinase hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK) in TAMs regulated the downstream phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-glutamine synthetase (GS)-HIF1α signaling pathway, leading to a reprogramming of TAM metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. This metabolic shift repolarized TAMs to the M1 phenotype, resulting in a decrease in interleukin (IL)-10 secretion, which enhanced the immune response of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells and increased the sensitivity of TNBC to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. This project uncovers a previously unrecognized anti-tumor mechanism of DCC-2036 and proposes a combination strategy that utilizes DCC-2036 alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve TNBC immunotherapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Institution of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hunan Province Clinical Research Center for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of

Author Info: (1) Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Institution of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hunan Province Clinical Research Center for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of High-incidence Sexually Transmitted Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (2) Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Institution of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hunan Province Clinical Research Center for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of High-incidence Sexually Transmitted Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (3) Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Institution of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hunan Province Clinical Research Center for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of High-incidence Sexually Transmitted Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (4) Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Institution of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hunan Province Clinical Research Center for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of High-incidence Sexually Transmitted Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (5) Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (6) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (7) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (8) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (9) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (10) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (11) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (12) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (13) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (14) Department of Spine Surgery, The Nanhua Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang 421002, China. (15) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. (16) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. Electronic address: zuxuyu@usc.edu.cn. (17) Cancer Research Institute, Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Drug Evaluation of Major Chronic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China. Electronic address: shenyingying1113@usc.edu.cn.

Cell cycle arrest enhances CD8+ T cell effector function by potentiating glucose metabolism and IL-2 signaling

Spotlight 

Haften and Sluis et al. showed that transient cell cycle arrest activated CD8⁺ T cells into a metabolically primed, IL-2-producing effector state that supported rapid proliferation and enhanced antitumor activity after release. During arrest, CD8+ T cells upregulated glycolysis, cholesterol metabolism, and mitochondrial activity, acquiring a memory-like metabolic and transcriptional state. Post-arrest proliferation was partially mTORC1-independent and relied on elevated, IL-2-mediated STAT5 signaling. Transient cell cycle arrest enhanced CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor control in immune checkpoint blockade, adoptive cell transfer, and vaccination models.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Haften and Sluis et al. showed that transient cell cycle arrest activated CD8⁺ T cells into a metabolically primed, IL-2-producing effector state that supported rapid proliferation and enhanced antitumor activity after release. During arrest, CD8+ T cells upregulated glycolysis, cholesterol metabolism, and mitochondrial activity, acquiring a memory-like metabolic and transcriptional state. Post-arrest proliferation was partially mTORC1-independent and relied on elevated, IL-2-mediated STAT5 signaling. Transient cell cycle arrest enhanced CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor control in immune checkpoint blockade, adoptive cell transfer, and vaccination models.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Cell cycle-inhibiting chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatment. Although the primary aim is to block tumor cell proliferation, their clinical efficacy also involves specific effector CD8(+) T cells that undergo synchronized proliferation and differentiation. How CD8(+) T cells are programmed when these processes are uncoupled, as occurs during cell cycle inhibition, is unclear. Here, we show that activated CD8(+) T cells arrested in their cell cycle can still undergo effector differentiation. Cell cycle-arrested CD8(+) T cells become metabolically reprogrammed into a highly energized state, enabling rapid and enhanced proliferation upon release from arrest. This metabolic imprinting is driven by increased nutrient uptake, storage and processing, leading to enhanced glycolysis in cell cycle-arrested cells. The nutrient sensible mTORC1 pathway, however, was not crucial. Instead, elevated interleukin-2 production during arrest activates STAT5 signaling, which supports expansion of the energized CD8(+) T cells following arrest. Transient arrest in vivo enables superior CD8(+) T cell-mediated tumor control across models of immune checkpoint blockade, adoptive cell transfer and therapeutic vaccination. Thus, transient uncoupling of CD8(+) T cell differentiation from cell cycle progression programs a favorable metabolic state that supports the efficacy of effector T cell-mediated immunotherapies.

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (2) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. De

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (2) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (3) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (4) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (5) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (6) Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (7) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (8) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (9) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (10) Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (11) Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (12) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (13) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (14) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (15) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (16) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (17) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (18) Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (19) Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (20) Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (21) Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (22) Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (23) Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (24) Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Sequencing Analysis Support Core, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (25) Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (26) Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (27) Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. (28) Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. r.arens@lumc.nl.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces tumor pyroptosis and immune activation to enhance checkpoint blockade in colorectal cancer Spotlight 

Hu et al. demonstrated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a) initiates caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in MC38 CRC cell lines. Pyroptosis – characterized by GSDME cleavage, intracellular ROS accumulation, and release of damage-associated molecular patterns, such as HMGB1 – is a form of immunogenic cell death that induces inflammatory cytokine secretion, PD-L1 upregulation on tumor cells, and functional maturation of dendritic cells in vitro. Intratumoral injection of P.a reprogrammed TMEs, increased CD8+ T cell infiltration, and led to synergistic tumor regression, without systemic toxicity when combined with anti-PD-L1 in an MC38 tumor model.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Hu et al. demonstrated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a) initiates caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in MC38 CRC cell lines. Pyroptosis – characterized by GSDME cleavage, intracellular ROS accumulation, and release of damage-associated molecular patterns, such as HMGB1 – is a form of immunogenic cell death that induces inflammatory cytokine secretion, PD-L1 upregulation on tumor cells, and functional maturation of dendritic cells in vitro. Intratumoral injection of P.a reprogrammed TMEs, increased CD8+ T cell infiltration, and led to synergistic tumor regression, without systemic toxicity when combined with anti-PD-L1 in an MC38 tumor model.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits limited responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), largely due to its immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and poor baseline immunogenicity. Here, we report that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) triggers caspase-3-dependent pyroptosis in murine CRC MC38 cells, characterized by GSDME cleavage, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). This form of immunogenic cell death promotes robust inflammatory cytokine secretion, upregulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells, and functional maturation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) in vitro. In vivo, intratumoral injection of P. aeruginosa leads to significant reprogramming of the TME, including increased expression of proinflammatory genes, DC maturation, and enhanced infiltration of CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Notably, combination therapy with P. aeruginosa and an anti-PD-L1 antibody results in synergistic tumor regression, markedly outperforming either monotherapy, without inducing detectable systemic toxicity. Together, our findings reveal that P. aeruginosa-induced pyroptosis serves as a potent immunogenic stimulus that reshapes the CRC tumor microenvironment and overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. This strategy represents a promising approach to enhance immunotherapy efficacy in poorly immunogenic solid tumors.

Author Info: (1) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. (2) Department of Neurology, Xindu District People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610500,

Author Info: (1) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. (2) Department of Neurology, Xindu District People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610500, China. (3) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. (4) Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Clinical IVD Joint Research Center of Chengdu Medical College-Maccura Biotechnology, Chengdu, 610500, China. Sichuan Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Prevention and Control Technology of Veterinary Drug Residue in Animal-Origin Food, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China. (5) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. (6) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. (7) Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Clinical IVD Joint Research Center of Chengdu Medical College-Maccura Biotechnology, Chengdu, 610500, China. Sichuan Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Prevention and Control Technology of Veterinary Drug Residue in Animal-Origin Food, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China. (8) Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Clinical IVD Joint Research Center of Chengdu Medical College-Maccura Biotechnology, Chengdu, 610500, China. Sichuan Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Prevention and Control Technology of Veterinary Drug Residue in Animal-Origin Food, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China. (9) Taishan Community Health Service Center, Jiangbei New District, Nanjing, 210032, China. (10) Department of Neurology, Xindu District People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610500, China. 501838695@qq.com. (11) Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Clinical IVD Joint Research Center of Chengdu Medical College-Maccura Biotechnology, Chengdu, 610500, China. renke@cmc.edu.cn. Sichuan Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Prevention and Control Technology of Veterinary Drug Residue in Animal-Origin Food, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China. renke@cmc.edu.cn. (12) The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210032, China. 2608236988@qq.com.

Physical activity decreases cancer burden by alleviating immunosenescence-related inflammation and improving overall immunity Spotlight 

In participants in the UK Biobank and a US National Survey, inflammation scores increased with age and in cases of chronic health conditions, and correlated positively with cancer incidence and mortality. 8 cancers were identified as inflammation-related, and aerobic physical activity correlated negatively with inflammation and cancer mortality. In C57 mice and Syrian hamsters, exercise impacted expression of genes associated with senescence, innate/adaptive immunity, and apoptosis, and boosted anti-inflammatory serum cytokines, compared to non-exercised controls. Mki67+ B and T cells had particularly high senescence-related gene scores.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

In participants in the UK Biobank and a US National Survey, inflammation scores increased with age and in cases of chronic health conditions, and correlated positively with cancer incidence and mortality. 8 cancers were identified as inflammation-related, and aerobic physical activity correlated negatively with inflammation and cancer mortality. In C57 mice and Syrian hamsters, exercise impacted expression of genes associated with senescence, innate/adaptive immunity, and apoptosis, and boosted anti-inflammatory serum cytokines, compared to non-exercised controls. Mki67+ B and T cells had particularly high senescence-related gene scores.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ABSTRACT: The associations between physical activity (PA) and the incidence and mortality of cancers and their underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Using mutually verifiable cohort studies with 443,768 adults in the United Kingdom and United States, we find that systemic inflammation, whose level increases with age, is dose-dependently associated with higher risks of eight inflammation-related cancers and all-cancer mortality. PA is dose-dependently associated with lower levels of systemic inflammation. Aerobic PA (117-500 min/week) is significantly associated with lower risks of inflammation-related cancers and all-cancer mortality. Single-cell sequencing, RNA sequencing, cytometry, and inflammation array show that aerobic exercise training downregulates immunosenescence-related gene expression, Mki67(+) immune cells, and pro-inflammatory molecules and upregulates anti-inflammatory factors, Flt3(+) immune cells, natural killers, and T lymphocytes in mice and hamsters, especially in older animals. These findings link exercise training to cancer risk reduction by alleviating inflammation, decreasing immunosenescence, and improving the reservoirs of overall immunity for cancer prevention.

Author Info: (1) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical Uni

Author Info: (1) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (2) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. (3) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (4) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (5) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (6) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. (7) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (8) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (9) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. (10) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (11) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. (12) Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. (13) Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. Electronic address: gcao@smmu.edu.cn.

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.