Journal Articles

The circadian gene Dec2 promotes pancreatic cancer progression and dormancy through immune evasion Spotlight 

Wang, Harris, and Dudgeon et al. identified the circadian rhythm gene Dec2 as a tumor-intrinsic regulator of dormancy and immune evasion in pancreatic cancer models. Dormant PDAC cells and occult disseminated tumor cells expressed high levels of Dec2, which repressed multiple components of the MHC-I antigen presentation pathway and reduced T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tumor surface MHC-I levels oscillated in antiphase to Dec2. Dec2 deletion restored antigen presentation, repolarized the PDAC TME from immune-cold to inflamed, and improved survival in immunocompetent (Ink4a.1 and 6419c5 models), but not immunodeficient mice.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Wang, Harris, and Dudgeon et al. identified the circadian rhythm gene Dec2 as a tumor-intrinsic regulator of dormancy and immune evasion in pancreatic cancer models. Dormant PDAC cells and occult disseminated tumor cells expressed high levels of Dec2, which repressed multiple components of the MHC-I antigen presentation pathway and reduced T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Tumor surface MHC-I levels oscillated in antiphase to Dec2. Dec2 deletion restored antigen presentation, repolarized the PDAC TME from immune-cold to inflamed, and improved survival in immunocompetent (Ink4a.1 and 6419c5 models), but not immunodeficient mice.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: The mechanisms that regulate immune evasion by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) remain poorly understood. Using a mouse model of resectable PDAC, we identified an unknown role of the circadian rhythm gene Differentially Expressed in Chondrocytes 2 (Dec2) in regulating tumor progression and dormancy. Deletion of Dec2 from tumor cells substantially increased mouse survival after resection due to an immune-mediated mechanism, as the survival benefit was abrogated under immunodeficient conditions. Dec2 promotes immune evasion by repressing major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)-dependent antigen presentation and by repolarizing the tumor microenvironment from immunologically cold (low T cell infiltration) to hot (elevated T cell infiltration). Dec2 is also a regulator of circadian rhythms, and we found that genes involved in MHC-I antigen presentation and MHC-I surface localization oscillated in a circadian manner, which was lost upon deletion of Dec2 in vitro. We conclude that Dec2 promotes primary PDAC progression and likely metastatic dormancy through immune evasion.

Author Info: (1) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical O

Author Info: (1) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (3) Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. (4) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (5) Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (6) Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (7) Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (8) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (9) Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. (10) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. (11) Dewitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. (12) Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. (13) Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. (14) Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. (15) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (16) Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. (17) Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. (18) Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (19) Center for Advanced Research Technologies, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. (20) Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. (21) Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. (22) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (23) Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (24) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (25) Dewitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. (26) Dewitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. (27) Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. (28) Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. (29) Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: darren_carpizo@urmc.rochester.edu.

Krüppel-like factor 2 programs early exhausted T cell states and restrains antiviral immunity

Spotlight 

Geng and Li et al. performed in vivo CRISPR screens in chronic LCMV infection and identified KLF2 as a central transcriptional regulator of CX3CR1+ effector-like exhausted (Texeff-like) CD8+ T cells. KLF2 directly engaged with Texeff-like loci, including Cx3cr1, and converted CX3CR1- cells into Texeff-like cells. KLF2 loss induced a TOX-dependent terminally exhausted state with enhanced activation, proliferation, and dendritic cell colocalization. KLF2 deficiency increased antigen-specific CD8+ T cell accumulation and improved viral control across stages of chronic infection. KLF2 and PD-1 co-deletion showed superior clearance, but with severe immunopathology.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Geng and Li et al. performed in vivo CRISPR screens in chronic LCMV infection and identified KLF2 as a central transcriptional regulator of CX3CR1+ effector-like exhausted (Texeff-like) CD8+ T cells. KLF2 directly engaged with Texeff-like loci, including Cx3cr1, and converted CX3CR1- cells into Texeff-like cells. KLF2 loss induced a TOX-dependent terminally exhausted state with enhanced activation, proliferation, and dendritic cell colocalization. KLF2 deficiency increased antigen-specific CD8+ T cell accumulation and improved viral control across stages of chronic infection. KLF2 and PD-1 co-deletion showed superior clearance, but with severe immunopathology.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: A key challenge in improving T cell-mediated immunotherapies is defining the factors that regulate functional versus exhausted T cell fates. Through multi-round in vivo CRISPR screens in chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus Clone 13 (LCMV Cl13) infection and transcription factor (TF) benchmarking, we identified Krppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) as a top TF driving CX3CR1(+) effector-like exhausted cell (Tex(eff-like)) differentiation. Overexpression of KLF2 converted CX3CR1_ cells into Tex(eff-like) cells by direct engagement of key loci. Conversely, loss of KLF2 increased inhibitory receptor expression and redirected cells toward terminal exhaustion. However, early after infection, KLF2 deficiency yielded increased CD8(+) T cell accumulation and improved viral control. This effect was, in part, mediated by TOX and improved T cell localization with dendritic cells. Additional deletion of PD-1 further enhanced viral control but induced severe immunopathology. Collectively, these findings identify KLF2 as a central regulator of the Tex(eff-like) program and underscore exhaustion features as checkpoints balancing antiviral immunity and immunopathology.

Author Info: (1) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, X

Author Info: (1) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (2) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (3) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (4) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (5) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (6) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (7) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (8) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (9) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (10) State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. (11) National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (12) State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 351002, China. (13) Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian 361023, China. (14) Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (15) State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. (16) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (17) National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China; State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (18) State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 351002, China. (19) School of Medicine, Xiamen University, South Xiang'an Road, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (20) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (21) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. (22) State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. (23) State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiang'an Hospital, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. Electronic address: honglinghuang@xmu.edu.cn.

Activated T cell extracellular vesicle DNA transfer enhances antigen presentation and anti-tumor immunity Spotlight 

Hu and Liu et al. found that activated T cells secreted abundant extracellular vesicular DNA (AT-EVDNA) that was mainly from newly made genomic DNA and was rich in immune-related genes. Upon uptake of EVs by tumor cells or dendritic cells, granzyme B encapsulated in the EVs disrupted the nuclear envelope and facilitated entry of EVDNA into the nucleus, where transient expression of the EVDNA increased antigen processing and presentation machinery and cytokine production, enhancing immunogenicity. In mouse models, AT-EVs overcame immune evasion and boosted immune checkpoint blockade, supporting their potential use as an acellular immunotherapy.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Hu and Liu et al. found that activated T cells secreted abundant extracellular vesicular DNA (AT-EVDNA) that was mainly from newly made genomic DNA and was rich in immune-related genes. Upon uptake of EVs by tumor cells or dendritic cells, granzyme B encapsulated in the EVs disrupted the nuclear envelope and facilitated entry of EVDNA into the nucleus, where transient expression of the EVDNA increased antigen processing and presentation machinery and cytokine production, enhancing immunogenicity. In mouse models, AT-EVs overcame immune evasion and boosted immune checkpoint blockade, supporting their potential use as an acellular immunotherapy.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: Antigen processing and presentation (APP) is essential for adaptive immunosurveillance. We uncover a mechanism whereby activated T cell-derived extracellular vesicles (AT(EVs)) drive a positive feedback loop that enhances antigen presentation and immune responses in normal physiology and cancer. AT(EV)-induced immunogenicity relies on extracellular vesicular double-stranded DNA (EV(DNA)), which is notably abundant and primarily composed of genomic DNA enriched in immune-related genes, including those encoding APP machinery. Mechanistically, granzyme B (Gzmb) packaged by AT(EVs) disrupts the nuclear envelope of recipient cells, facilitating intranuclear transfer and subsequent transient expression of EV(DNA) encoding APP genes. DNase treatment removes most AT-EV(DNA), abrogating APP upregulation and thus T cell activation and recruitment to tumors. Notably, AT(EVs) hold promise as an acellular immunotherapy, restoring APP and synergizing with checkpoint blockade in immunotherapy-refractory tumors. Collectively, our findings uncover a mechanism of transient, non-viral gene delivery by AT(EVs) that boosts APP and anti-tumor immunity while limiting autoimmunity.

Author Info: (1) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center

Author Info: (1) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. (2) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (3) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (4) Department of Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (5) Department of Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (6) Department of Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (7) Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. (8) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (9) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan. (10) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linkšping University, Linkšping, Sweden. (11) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (12) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (13) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (14) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (15) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (16) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (17) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (18) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (19) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (20) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (21) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (22) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (23) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (24) Proteomics Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA. (25) Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (26) Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. (27) Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (28) Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. (29) Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Therapeutic Resistance, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. (30) Laboratory of Biology of Tumor and Development, UniversitŽ de Lige, Lige, Belgium. (31) Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. (32) Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. (33) Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY 11724, USA. (34) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (35) Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (36) Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (37) Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (38) Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (39) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (40) Drukier Institute for Children's Health and Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (41) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. (42) Department of Physiology, Biophysics, and Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (43) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: haz2005@med.cornell.edu. (44) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: irm2224@med.cornell.edu. (45) Children's Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children's Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: dcl2001@med.cornell.edu.

Selective depletion of virus-specific CD8 T cells from the liver after PD-1 therapy with Fc-intact antibody during chronic infection Spotlight 

Hashimoto et al. demonstrated that the Fc region of species-matched mouse anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies engaged with activating FcγRIII and triggered phagocytosis of LCMV-specific CD8+ T cells in the context of chronic infection. T cell depletion occurred preferentially in the liver, and impaired viral control in this organ. The effect was not limited to a specific antibody clone or IgG subclass, and was affected by mutations in the Fc region (no binding to FcγR) or afucosylation (enhanced FcγR affinity), and the presence of immune complexes. In a CT26 tumor model, the Fc-wild-type antibody depleted intratumoral PD1+ tumor-specific CD8+ T cells and accelerated tumor growth.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

Hashimoto et al. demonstrated that the Fc region of species-matched mouse anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies engaged with activating FcγRIII and triggered phagocytosis of LCMV-specific CD8+ T cells in the context of chronic infection. T cell depletion occurred preferentially in the liver, and impaired viral control in this organ. The effect was not limited to a specific antibody clone or IgG subclass, and was affected by mutations in the Fc region (no binding to FcγR) or afucosylation (enhanced FcγR affinity), and the presence of immune complexes. In a CT26 tumor model, the Fc-wild-type antibody depleted intratumoral PD1+ tumor-specific CD8+ T cells and accelerated tumor growth.

Contributed by Ute Burkhardt

ABSTRACT: Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody therapy is now widely used in various cancers. However, the role of the antibody Fc region in PD-1 directed immunotherapy is not well understood. Preclinical studies commonly use species-mismatched rat anti-mouse antibodies, which may not accurately reflect antibody-Fc gamma receptor (Fc_R) interactions. Here, we used mouse anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies to investigate how the Fc region influences therapeutic efficacy for enhancing CD8 T cell responses using mouse models of chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection and CT26 tumors. Treatment with these mouse anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies caused preferential depletion of PD-1+ virus-specific CD8 T cells in the liver, resulting in increased viral titers. These effects of mouse anti-PD-1 antibodies were Fc dependent since mutating the Fc region to block Fc_R interaction prevented PD-1+ CD8 T cell depletion and resulted in effective immunotherapy. Using mice lacking activating Fc_R III or inhibitory Fc_R IIb, we found that depletion of PD-1+ CD8 T cells was mediated via activating Fc_R III. Furthermore, we determined that phagocytic cells, not natural killer cells, were the in vivo effectors that mediated depletion of PD-1+ CD8 T cells. Similar depletion of tumor-specific CD8 T cells and reduced tumor control were observed in the CT26 model with Fc-intact mouse anti-mouse PD-1 treatment. These findings highlight potential negative effects of Fc-functional anti-PD-1 antibodies in therapies for liver cancer, liver metastases, and chronic hepatotropic viral infections. Conversely, Fc_R-mediated depletion could benefit "agonistic" anti-PD-1 antibodies for treatment of autoimmunity. Our research emphasizes the importance of Fc region in tailoring PD-1 therapies for diverse clinical applications.

Author Info: (1) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Author Info: (1) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (2) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (3) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. CHA Biotech, CHA Bio Complex, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13488, Republic of Korea. (4) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. Medical Scientist Training Program, UCSF Graduate Division, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143. (5) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Inflammation and Tolerance, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229. (6) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Viral Immunology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Republic of Korea. (7) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (8) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (9) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar 140001, India. (10) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (11) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (12) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (13) Department of Otolaryngology, Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210. (14) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Otolaryngology, Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210. (15) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (16) Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. (17) Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA Gene Lay Institute of Immunology and Inflammation of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (18) Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065. (19) Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115. (20) Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Debio 1562M CD37-targeting ADC is highly active and well tolerated in preclinical models of AML and MDS Spotlight 

Addressing the need for superior toxin delivery and safety for AML and MDS therapies, Marx et al. developed Debio 1562M, a next-generation ADC targeting CD37, which is broadly expressed on AML and MDS blasts. Debio 1562M (with a drug [DM1]-to-naratuximab ratio of 8, and a cathepsin-cleavable linker) was efficiently internalized and killed blast cells in blood and bone marrow. In multiple models, Debio 1562M outperformed standard-of-care treatments, and demonstrated broad and efficient anti-leukemic activity on all AML subtypes. Compared to 1st generation CD37 ADC, Debio 1562M had an improved toxicity profile in mice, and is in a phase 1 trial for r/r AML and high-risk MDS.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

Addressing the need for superior toxin delivery and safety for AML and MDS therapies, Marx et al. developed Debio 1562M, a next-generation ADC targeting CD37, which is broadly expressed on AML and MDS blasts. Debio 1562M (with a drug [DM1]-to-naratuximab ratio of 8, and a cathepsin-cleavable linker) was efficiently internalized and killed blast cells in blood and bone marrow. In multiple models, Debio 1562M outperformed standard-of-care treatments, and demonstrated broad and efficient anti-leukemic activity on all AML subtypes. Compared to 1st generation CD37 ADC, Debio 1562M had an improved toxicity profile in mice, and is in a phase 1 trial for r/r AML and high-risk MDS.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: The leukocyte antigen CD37 is broadly expressed on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and associated with poor prognosis. We demonstrate that myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) cells also express CD37, and both AML and MDS cells have favorable internalization properties of this receptor. Debio 1562M is a next-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets CD37 and is optimized to deliver more toxins to tumor cells than the first-generation ADC Debio 1562, while maintaining a good safety profile. Preclinically, Debio 1562M showed robust anti-leukemic activity in AML and MDS primary samples and in AML xenograft models, irrespective of disease stage or genotype. Debio 1562M was able to target leukemic stem cells in vitro and significantly decrease tumor burden in blood and bone marrow, resulting in survival prolongation compared with standard-of-care treatments. These data demonstrate that CD37 is a relevant target for both indications and that Debio 1562M is a promising therapeutic candidate.

Author Info: (1) Debiopharm Research and Manufacturing SA, 1920 Martigny, Switzerland. (2) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (3) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausann

Author Info: (1) Debiopharm Research and Manufacturing SA, 1920 Martigny, Switzerland. (2) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (3) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (4) Debiopharm Research and Manufacturing SA, 1920 Martigny, Switzerland. (5) Debiopharm Research and Manufacturing SA, 1920 Martigny, Switzerland. (6) Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. (7) Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. (8) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (9) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (10) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. (11) Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. (12) Debiopharm International SA, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: lisa.ivanschitz@debiopharm.com.

mRNA vaccines engage unconventional pathways in CD8+ T cell priming

Featured  

Jo et al. investigated mechanisms of CD8+ T cell priming induced by mRNA-LNP vaccines. Priming occurred in lymphoid organs, using cDC1s and cDC2s as APCs. Cross-presentation was not a primary mechanism; instead, cross-dressing contributed to cDC2-induced priming, which was dependent on type I IFN signaling. CD8+ T cells primed this way exhibited antitumor activity, and functional memory cells were induced. cDC1 induced more cycling and stem-like populations, while cDC2 induced more clonally expanded terminal effector cells.

Jo et al. investigated mechanisms of CD8+ T cell priming induced by mRNA-LNP vaccines. Priming occurred in lymphoid organs, using cDC1s and cDC2s as APCs. Cross-presentation was not a primary mechanism; instead, cross-dressing contributed to cDC2-induced priming, which was dependent on type I IFN signaling. CD8+ T cells primed this way exhibited antitumor activity, and functional memory cells were induced. cDC1 induced more cycling and stem-like populations, while cDC2 induced more clonally expanded terminal effector cells.

ABSTRACT: Vaccines composed of mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) activate B cells and T cells by inducing in vivo production of specific protein antigens. While B cells can be activated directly by antigens, T cell activation requires antigen processing and presentation by MHC molecules on specialized antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In response to viral infections, tumours, and protein- and cDNA-based vaccines, antigen presentation to CD8(+) T cells is particularly dependent on type 1 conventional dendritic (cDC1) cells, which are specialized for efficient cross-presentation of exogenous antigens(1-4). However, whether similar mechanisms have a role in mRNA-LNP vaccination is unclear. Here we report that mRNA-LNP vaccines do not require cDC1 cells or the WDFY4-dependent cross-presentation pathway for CD8(+) T cell priming but instead engage both cDC1 and cDC2 cells redundantly. While CD8(+) T cells primed exclusively by either cDC1 or cDC2 cells showed phenotypic differences, both could mediate anti-tumour responses and memory formation. Importantly, acquisition by cDCs of peptide-MHC-I complexes from non-haematopoietic cells, called cross-dressing, provides a substantial component of CD8(+) T cell priming, in a manner dependent on type I interferon. mRNA-LNP induction of cross-dressing might explain their ability to activate CD8(+) T cells against antigens not encoded by the vaccine.

Author Info: (1) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis Sc

Author Info: (1) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (2) Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (3) Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (4) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (5) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (6) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (7) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (8) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (9) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (10) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (11) Innovac Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA. (12) Innovac Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA. (13) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (14) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (15) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (16) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. (17) Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. gillandersw@wustl.edu. The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. gillandersw@wustl.edu. The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. gillandersw@wustl.edu. (18) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. kmurphy@wustl.edu.

Immune-induced TCR-like antibodies regulate specific T cell response in mice Spotlight 

Kishida et al. showed that immune-induced TCR-like antibodies (iTabs) – antibodies that are specific to an antigen peptide–MHC-II complex – were produced during helper T cell responses to immunization with various antigens. These iTabs induced antigen-dependent depletion of target cells, blocked TCR recognition of specific peptide–MHC-II complexes, and prevented activation of antigen-specific T cells, but only when the presented peptides contained specific flanking residues. In a mouse model, treatment with iTabs or immunization with a peptide that induced iTabs effectively limited the development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Kishida et al. showed that immune-induced TCR-like antibodies (iTabs) – antibodies that are specific to an antigen peptide–MHC-II complex – were produced during helper T cell responses to immunization with various antigens. These iTabs induced antigen-dependent depletion of target cells, blocked TCR recognition of specific peptide–MHC-II complexes, and prevented activation of antigen-specific T cells, but only when the presented peptides contained specific flanking residues. In a mouse model, treatment with iTabs or immunization with a peptide that induced iTabs effectively limited the development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: Antigen-specific regulation of T cell response is crucial for limiting hyperimmune response. However, the molecular mechanisms governing specific immune regulation remain unclear. In this study, we discover that antibodies specific to the antigen peptide-MHC class II complex are produced during helper T cell responses to various antigens, including hen egg lysozyme and proteolipid protein peptide. These antibodies specifically inhibit T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of MHC class II molecules presenting specific antigen peptide. We term these antibodies 'immune-induced TCR-like antibodies' or iTabs. Immunization with peptides containing flanking residues induces iTabs whereas immunization with peptides lacking flanking residues does not. Furthermore, we show that immunization with iTab-inducible peptide or iTab treatment suppress autoimmune disease development in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Thus, our findings provide a strategy for suppressing antigen-specific helper T cell responses using specific peptides, potentially controlling autoimmune diseases.

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunochemistry, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. (2) Biostructural Mechanism Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunochemistry, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. (2) Biostructural Mechanism Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Hyogo, Japan. (3) Department of Drug Target Protein Research, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan. Department of Structural Biology and Biochemistry, Institute of New Industry Incubation, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. (4) Department of Immunochemistry, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Laboratory for Innate Immune Systems, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. (5) Biostructural Mechanism Group, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Hyogo, Japan. Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan. (6) Department of Drug Target Protein Research, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan. Department of Structural Biology and Biochemistry, Institute of New Industry Incubation, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. (7) Department of Immunochemistry, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. arase@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp. Laboratory of Immunochemistry, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. arase@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp. Center for Advanced Modalities and DDS, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. arase@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp. Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. arase@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Agonistic anti-CD40 antibody treatment converts resident regulatory T cells into activated type 1 effectors within the tumor microenvironment Featured  

Maltez et al. reported that in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, treatment with agonist anti-CD40 induced spatial reorganization of Tregs within PDAC tumor microenvironments, and supported the conversion of conventional Tregs into “ExTregs”. These effects were dependent on cDC1s through Cxcl9/Cxcr3-mediated recruitment, IFNγ and IL-12 stimulation, and direct TCR–MHC-II interactions with Tregs in the tumor periphery. In Tregs, these interactions activated nuclear translocation of NFAT1, leading to Foxp3 loss and acquisition of Th1-like features, including Tbet and IFNγ expression. Observations in patient samples were consistent with this pattern, and loss of Tregs was associated with longer disease-free survival.

Maltez et al. reported that in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, treatment with agonist anti-CD40 induced spatial reorganization of Tregs within PDAC tumor microenvironments, and supported the conversion of conventional Tregs into “ExTregs”. These effects were dependent on cDC1s through Cxcl9/Cxcr3-mediated recruitment, IFNγ and IL-12 stimulation, and direct TCR–MHC-II interactions with Tregs in the tumor periphery. In Tregs, these interactions activated nuclear translocation of NFAT1, leading to Foxp3 loss and acquisition of Th1-like features, including Tbet and IFNγ expression. Observations in patient samples were consistent with this pattern, and loss of Tregs was associated with longer disease-free survival.

ABSTRACT: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), agonistic anti-CD40 (αCD40) reduces frequencies of intratumoral regulatory T (Treg) cells despite a lack of CD40 expression on Treg cells. Here, we leveraged spatiotemporal imaging and lineage tracing approaches to examine intratumoral Treg cell fate in a mouse model of PDAC, where immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) (αPD-1 + αCTLA-4) combined with αCD40 controls tumor growth. Intratumoral Foxp3+ Treg cell numbers collapsed upon treatment, dependent on CD40-activated dendritic cells (DCs) and induction of interleukin (IL)-12 and interferon (IFN)-γ. This reduction corresponded with cellular alterations; Treg cells acquired an "ExTreg" phenotype characterized by loss of Foxp3 expression and acquisition of T helper 1 (Th1)-like features (Tbet+IFN-γ+). αCD40 promoted a spatially reorganized tumor microenvironment (TME), with Cxcr3⁺ Treg and ExTreg cells localized to the tumor periphery with Cxcl9-expressing DCs. Through in situ analyses of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, we found that ExTreg cells had the highest antigen-driven activation among tumor-infiltrating T cells. Reprogramming of intratumoral Treg cells into Th1-like effectors reveals plasticity and an anti-tumor capacity of these cells.

Author Info: (1) Postdoctoral Research Associate Training (PRAT) Program Fellow, NIGMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Beth

Author Info: (1) Postdoctoral Research Associate Training (PRAT) Program Fellow, NIGMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. (2) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (3) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (4) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (5) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (6) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (7) Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. (8) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (9) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (10) The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (11) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. (12) Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (13) Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Center for Advanced Tissue Imaging (CAT-I), NIAID and NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: rgermain@niaid.nih.gov. (14) Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; The Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: byrneka@ohsu.edu.

Mitochondrial metabolism and signaling direct dendritic cell function in antitumor immunity Spotlight 

You and Kim et al. identified discrete mitochondrial states in intratumoral cDC1s, wherein cDC1s with polarized mitochondria more effectively primed CD8+ T cells than depolarized cDC1s. OPA1 regulated mitochondrial fusion and membrane potential, sustaining NRF1 expression, OXPHOS, and NAD+/NADH balance to support cDC1 functional fitness. The OPA1-NRF1 axis suppressed autophagy- and lysosome-mediated degradation of MHC-I and antigens to support cDC1 immunogenic function. OPA1 loss impaired antigen presentation and promoted tumor growth, while whole-tumor-cell-pulsed polarized cDC1 administration synergized with ICB in solid tumor models.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

You and Kim et al. identified discrete mitochondrial states in intratumoral cDC1s, wherein cDC1s with polarized mitochondria more effectively primed CD8+ T cells than depolarized cDC1s. OPA1 regulated mitochondrial fusion and membrane potential, sustaining NRF1 expression, OXPHOS, and NAD+/NADH balance to support cDC1 functional fitness. The OPA1-NRF1 axis suppressed autophagy- and lysosome-mediated degradation of MHC-I and antigens to support cDC1 immunogenic function. OPA1 loss impaired antigen presentation and promoted tumor growth, while whole-tumor-cell-pulsed polarized cDC1 administration synergized with ICB in solid tumor models.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Antitumor immunity requires conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s). How cDC1s maintain functional fitness in the tumor microenvironment remains unclear. In this study, we established that intratumoral cDC1s exhibited discrete mitochondrial states and that OPA1-mediated mitochondrial energy and redox metabolism dictated cDC1 antitumor responses. Mechanistically, OPA1 orchestrated antigen presentation and the CD8(+) T cell priming function of cDC1s by promoting nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) expression and electron transport chain integrity, thereby supporting bioenergetics and NAD(+)/NADH balance. During tumor progression, mitochondrial membrane potential and volume, as well as OPA1-NRF1 signaling, declined in intratumoral cDC1s. Furthermore, intratumoral administration of cDC1s with polarized mitochondria showed immunotherapeutic benefits in mice, particularly in combination with immune checkpoint blockade. Collectively, our findings reveal mitochondrial metabolism and signaling as putative targets to reinvigorate cDC1 function for cancer immunotherapy.

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (2) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (3) De

Author Info: (1) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (2) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (3) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (4) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (5) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (6) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (7) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (8) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (9) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (10) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (11) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (12) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (13) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (14) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (15) Cell and Tissue Imaging Center, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. (16) Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

The CD4+ T cell population partners with Tpex CD8+ T cells to mediate antitumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment

Spotlight 

Takei et al. identified IL-7Rhi CCR6+ Th1-like CD4+ T cells (Th7R) that were distinct from Th1 and Th17 states. Th7R cells expressed CXCL13 and lymphotoxin-β, localized to TLSs, and associated with high endothelial venules. Th7R abundance correlated with GZMK+GZMB- progenitor exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tpex) across tumors and lymph nodes. Adoptive transfer of Th7R cells into mice bearing MCA205 skin tumors expanded Tpex and Tex populations, supported Tpex maintenance and differentiation, and enhanced tumor control. Intratumoral and circulating Th7R correlated with response to PD-1 blockade, and improved clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Takei et al. identified IL-7Rhi CCR6+ Th1-like CD4+ T cells (Th7R) that were distinct from Th1 and Th17 states. Th7R cells expressed CXCL13 and lymphotoxin-β, localized to TLSs, and associated with high endothelial venules. Th7R abundance correlated with GZMK+GZMB- progenitor exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tpex) across tumors and lymph nodes. Adoptive transfer of Th7R cells into mice bearing MCA205 skin tumors expanded Tpex and Tex populations, supported Tpex maintenance and differentiation, and enhanced tumor control. Intratumoral and circulating Th7R correlated with response to PD-1 blockade, and improved clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: CD4⁺ T cells support the priming, expansion, and function of CD8⁺ T cells through dendritic cells. Precursor exhausted T cells (Tpex) maintain self-renewal and supply cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), but the identity of their CD4⁺ T-cell partners remains unclear. Here, we perform scRNA-seq, scTCR-seq, and mass cytometry analysis on peripheral blood, tumor, and lymph nodes primarily from lung cancer patients and, in part, renal cell carcinoma. We identify an IL-7Rhigh CCR6⁺ Th1-like CD4⁺ T cell-population, named Th7R, that is numerically and spatially partnered with Tpex. Th7R cells express lymphotoxin-β and CXCL13, correlate with high endothelial venules, and co-localize with Tpex in tertiary lymphoid structures. Th7R cell abundance correlates with Tpex numbers in the TME and lymph nodes, and adoptive transfer of Th7R increases Tpex in a preclinical mouse model. Intratumoral Th7R and Tpex associate with improved response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade therapy. These results suggest that Th7R cells act as partners of Tpex to sustain antitumor T-cell immunity.

Author Info: (1) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto Pr

Author Info: (1) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. (2) Department of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (3) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (4) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (5) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (6) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (7) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (8) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (9) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (10) Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (11) Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (12) Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (13) Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (14) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. (15) Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. kagamu19@saitama-med.ac.jp.

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.