Journal Articles

Modulating AP-1 enables CAR T cells to establish an intratumoral stemlike reservoir and overcomes resistance to PD-1 blockade Spotlight 

ROR1 CAR T cells infiltrated ROR1+ NSCLC mouse tumors, but lost TCF1 expression and failed to maintain a progenitor exhausted (Tpex) population. The addition of anti-PD-L1 did not improve CAR T cell counts or efficacy, and further drove exhaustion. Snyder et al. found that co-delivery of c-Jun by the ROR1 CAR transiently increased CAR-T tumor accumulation and Tpex phenotype, and combining with anti-PD-L1 further improved tumor T cell counts, c-Jun expression, phenotype, and efficacy. Spatial transcriptomics found that c-Jun CAR-T were distributed throughout lung tumors, proximal to PD-L1+ myeloid cells, and Tpex-enriched relative to standard CAR-T.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ROR1 CAR T cells infiltrated ROR1+ NSCLC mouse tumors, but lost TCF1 expression and failed to maintain a progenitor exhausted (Tpex) population. The addition of anti-PD-L1 did not improve CAR T cell counts or efficacy, and further drove exhaustion. Snyder et al. found that co-delivery of c-Jun by the ROR1 CAR transiently increased CAR-T tumor accumulation and Tpex phenotype, and combining with anti-PD-L1 further improved tumor T cell counts, c-Jun expression, phenotype, and efficacy. Spatial transcriptomics found that c-Jun CAR-T were distributed throughout lung tumors, proximal to PD-L1+ myeloid cells, and Tpex-enriched relative to standard CAR-T.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ABSTRACT: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has shown limited synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but the mechanisms underlying resistance remain unclear. Stemlike T cells coexpressing programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T cell factor 1 (TCF1) mediate responses to PD-1-PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) blockade and are maintained by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-dependent interactions with dendritic cells in lymphoid tissues. Because CAR T cells recognize intact antigen rather than peptide-MHC, their activation is restricted to tumors, potentially limiting maintenance of this critical subset. In murine models of lung cancer, CAR T cells down-regulated TCF1, became exhausted, and were not enhanced by PD-L1 blockade. Overexpression of the transcription factor c-Jun increased intratumoral PD-1(+)TCF1(+) CAR T cells but did not prevent exhaustion, given that PD-1 induced posttranscriptional c-Jun down-regulation. PD-L1 blockade restored c-Jun levels, markedly increased CAR T cells, and enabled near-complete tumor clearance, revealing a mechanism by which MHC-independent CAR T cells can be engineered to overcome resistance to PD-1-PD-L1 blockade.

Author Info: (1) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Medical Sc

Author Info: (1) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. (2) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (3) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. (4) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. (5) Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (6) Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (7) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. (8) Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA,USA. (9) Genomics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (10) Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (11) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. (12) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (13) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (14) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (15) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Invent Program, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. (16) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (17) Comparative Medicine, Translational Research Model Services, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (18) Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (19) Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (20) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (21) Lyell Immunopharma, South San Francisco, CA, USA. (22) Lyell Immunopharma, South San Francisco, CA, USA. (23) Fred Hutch Innovation Lab, Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (24) Fred Hutch Innovation Lab, Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (25) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA,USA. Center for Metastasis Research eXcellence (MET-X), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (26) Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (27) Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. (28) Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Dynamic reprogramming of the tumor immune network via multicycle checkpoint degradation for cancer immunotherapy Spotlight 

Chi et al. engineered a recyclable PD-L1 degrader (RECYC) by fusing a moderate-affinity peptide binder of PD-L1 to an aptamer against the ubiquitous endolysosomal trafficking receptor CI-M6PR. RECYC robustly degraded PD-L1 in tumor and myeloid cells, and exhibited pH-sensitive dissociation from PD-L1, enabling repeated knockdown following membrane recycling. I.v. RECYC outperformed anti-PD-L1 in multiple tumor models. and drove greater PD-L1 knockdown in tumor and myeloid cells, which correlated with efficacy. RECYC enhanced T cell infiltration and early activation, and uniquely promoted M1/N1-like skewing in tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils.

Contributed by Morgan Janes

Chi et al. engineered a recyclable PD-L1 degrader (RECYC) by fusing a moderate-affinity peptide binder of PD-L1 to an aptamer against the ubiquitous endolysosomal trafficking receptor CI-M6PR. RECYC robustly degraded PD-L1 in tumor and myeloid cells, and exhibited pH-sensitive dissociation from PD-L1, enabling repeated knockdown following membrane recycling. I.v. RECYC outperformed anti-PD-L1 in multiple tumor models. and drove greater PD-L1 knockdown in tumor and myeloid cells, which correlated with efficacy. RECYC enhanced T cell infiltration and early activation, and uniquely promoted M1/N1-like skewing in tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils.

Contributed by Morgan Janes

ABSTRACT: The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade is often limited by intrinsic immunosuppressive networks within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Despite progress in cancer treatment, current extracellular targeted protein degradation approaches often overlook the multicellular distribution and crosstalk of immune checkpoints. Here we reported a Receptor-mediated Endolysosomal recYcling Chimera (RECYC) platform. RECYC employs a CI-M6PR-targeting aptamer that remains stable across late endosomal pH and a protein-binding peptide with moderate affinity and pH responsiveness, which together drive recycling and sustained checkpoint clearance. In ex vivo co-culture and in vivo murine models, RECYC efficiently eliminated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression from both tumor cells and tumor-associated myeloid cells (macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells). By converting an immunosuppressive TIME to an immunostimulatory state, RECYC remodeled the tumor-immune network in an anti-tumor direction, thereby enhancing CD8(+) T cell response and repolarizing immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Moreover, in both immune-cold and immune-hot murine cancer models, RECYC demonstrated superior anti-tumor effect compared to PD-L1 blockade treatment. Collectively, we propose an effective strategy to induce recycling and broad checkpoint clearance in the TIME, which in turn reprograms the multicellular tumor-immune network to achieve durable immunotherapy responses.

Author Info: (1) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (2) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nan

Author Info: (1) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (2) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (3) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (4) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (5) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (6) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (7) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (8) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (9) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. (10) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (11) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (12) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (13) Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. (14) Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China. ChemBioMed Interdisciplinary Research Center, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210061, China. Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.

VISTA drives pancreatic tumor progression through modulation of the tumor-associated macrophage polarity Spotlight 

Shin and Kim et al. demonstrated that VISTA deletion enhanced macrophage and CD8+ T cell infiltration and reduced tumor growth in orthotopic Pan02 and KPC pancreatic mouse tumor models. VISTA deficiency reprogrammed TAMs from a suppressive SPP1+ to a stimulatory CXCL9+ phenotype. CXCL9+ TAMs exhibited enhanced antigen processing and cross-presentation, and increased recruitment of CXCR3+ CD8+ T cells with sustained cytotoxicity and reduced exhaustion. Anti-VISTA plus gemcitabine produced a synergistic antitumor response. In human PDAC datasets, expression of VSIR (encoding VISTA) correlated with immunosuppressive macrophage states.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Shin and Kim et al. demonstrated that VISTA deletion enhanced macrophage and CD8+ T cell infiltration and reduced tumor growth in orthotopic Pan02 and KPC pancreatic mouse tumor models. VISTA deficiency reprogrammed TAMs from a suppressive SPP1+ to a stimulatory CXCL9+ phenotype. CXCL9+ TAMs exhibited enhanced antigen processing and cross-presentation, and increased recruitment of CXCR3+ CD8+ T cells with sustained cytotoxicity and reduced exhaustion. Anti-VISTA plus gemcitabine produced a synergistic antitumor response. In human PDAC datasets, expression of VSIR (encoding VISTA) correlated with immunosuppressive macrophage states.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies due to its highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which limits effective therapeutic interventions. Here, we demonstrate that V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) plays a crucial role in orchestrating macrophage polarity within the PDAC TME. Using murine PDAC models, we show that VISTA deficiency markedly impairs tumor growth, leading to prolonged survival. Functionally, VISTA deficiency is linked to a shift in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from an immunosuppressive phenotype marked by secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), to one enriched for C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), indicative of a pro-inflammatory state. This shift is accompanied by enhanced recruitment of CXCR3⁺ CD8⁺ T cells with sustained cytotoxic potential, among which terminal exhaustion-like CD8+ T cell states are less prevalent. Additionally, VISTA-deficient TAMs exhibit increased antigen cross-presentation, further amplifying CD8+ T cell response against tumors. These findings are corroborated by human PDAC data, which reflect similar immune reprogramming trends. By defining the role of VISTA in controlling Cxcl9:Spp1 ratio and modulating CD8⁺ T cell dynamics, this study positions VISTA inhibition as a promising strategy to reshape the TME and potentiate anti-tumor immunity in PDAC.

Author Info: (1) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul

Author Info: (1) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Gangwon, Republic of Korea. Convergence Research Center for Dementia, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (2) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (3) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Gangwon, Republic of Korea. Convergence Research Center for Dementia, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (4) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Department of Pharmacology, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (5) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Gangwon, Republic of Korea. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Department of Pharmacology, Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (6) Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (7) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (8) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyunmu.shin@snu.ac.kr. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Gangwon, Republic of Korea. hyunmu.shin@snu.ac.kr. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyunmu.shin@snu.ac.kr. Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyunmu.shin@snu.ac.kr. (9) Samsung Precision Genome Medicine Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hangrae.kim@skku.edu. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hangrae.kim@skku.edu. (10) Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dlee5522@snu.ac.kr. Convergence Research Center for Dementia, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dlee5522@snu.ac.kr. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dlee5522@snu.ac.kr.

Precancerous niche remodelling dictates nascent tumour persistence Spotlight 

Using the DEN carcinogenesis model, Skrupskelyte and Arias et al. showed that early tumor persistence depended on the formation of a fibrotic precancerous niche. Stress responses in nascent epithelial lesions activated EGFR signaling, induced SOX9⁺, recruited PDGFRαlow fibroblasts, and drove the formation of a fibronectin (FN1)-rich niche that promoted tumor growth. Tumor-derived stroma alone was sufficient to impose tumor traits in normal epithelium. Inhibition of either fibronectin fibrillogenesis or EGFR signaling prevented niche formation and reduced tumor burdens. Heterogeneous AREG+ (an EGF ligand) and/or SOX9+ populations were present in early human oesophageal carcinoma.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Using the DEN carcinogenesis model, Skrupskelyte and Arias et al. showed that early tumor persistence depended on the formation of a fibrotic precancerous niche. Stress responses in nascent epithelial lesions activated EGFR signaling, induced SOX9⁺, recruited PDGFRαlow fibroblasts, and drove the formation of a fibronectin (FN1)-rich niche that promoted tumor growth. Tumor-derived stroma alone was sufficient to impose tumor traits in normal epithelium. Inhibition of either fibronectin fibrillogenesis or EGFR signaling prevented niche formation and reduced tumor burdens. Heterogeneous AREG+ (an EGF ligand) and/or SOX9+ populations were present in early human oesophageal carcinoma.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: Interactions between mutant cells and their environment have a key role in determining cancer susceptibility(1-3). However, understanding of how the precancerous microenvironment contributes to early tumorigenesis remains limited. Here we show that newly emerging tumours at their most incipient stages shape their microenvironment in a critical process that determines their survival. Analysis of nascent squamous tumours in the upper gastrointestinal tract of the mouse reveals that the stress response of early tumour cells instructs the underlying mesenchyme to form a supportive 'precancerous niche', which dictates the long-term outcome of epithelial lesions. Stimulated fibroblasts beneath emerging tumours activate a wound-healing response that triggers a marked remodelling of the underlying extracellular matrix, resulting in the formation of a fibronectin-rich stromal scaffold that promotes tumour growth. Functional heterotypic 3D culture assays and in vivo grafting experiments, combining carcinogen-free healthy epithelium and tumour-derived stroma, demonstrate that the precancerous niche alone is sufficient to confer tumour properties to normal epithelial cells. We propose a model in which both mutations and the stromal response to genetic stress together define the likelihood of early tumours to persist and progress towards more advanced disease stages.

Author Info: (1) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gs463@cam.ac.uk. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience,

Author Info: (1) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gs463@cam.ac.uk. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gs463@cam.ac.uk. (2) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. RhyGaze, Basel, Switzerland. (3) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (4) Max Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany. Center for Systems Biology, Dresden, Germany. (5) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (6) Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (7) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (8) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (9) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. Cambridge Institute of Science, Altos Labs, Cambridge, UK. (10) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. (11) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. (12) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. (13) University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Faculty of Medicine of TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital CGC Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. (14) Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine of TUD, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. (15) Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine of TUD, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. (16) Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. (17) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK. (18) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK. Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. (19) Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany. Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Ludwigs-Maximilians-UniversitŠt Munchen, Munich, Germany. (20) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. (21) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. mpa28@cam.ac.uk. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. mpa28@cam.ac.uk.

Engineering CAR T cells to secrete VEGF-neutralizing scFvs enhances antitumor activity against solid tumors Spotlight 

To improve anti-angiogenic therapies in VEGF-overexpressing solid tumors, Gao et al. engineered CAR T cells to secrete anti-VEGF scFvs (CAR-αVEGF T cells) and compared their efficacy with standard CAR T cell therapy alone or combined with anti-VEGF Ab. αVEGF-scFv secretion resulted in superior CAR T cell efficacy in ovarian cancer and orthotopic glioma models. Mechanistically, CAR-αVEGF T cells prevented treatment-induced angiogenesis and hypoxia, promoted CD8+ T cell activation and mitochondrial fitness, and boosted immune-stimulatory myeloid phenotypes, while decreasing infiltration of suppressive, VEGF-expressing myeloid cells.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

To improve anti-angiogenic therapies in VEGF-overexpressing solid tumors, Gao et al. engineered CAR T cells to secrete anti-VEGF scFvs (CAR-αVEGF T cells) and compared their efficacy with standard CAR T cell therapy alone or combined with anti-VEGF Ab. αVEGF-scFv secretion resulted in superior CAR T cell efficacy in ovarian cancer and orthotopic glioma models. Mechanistically, CAR-αVEGF T cells prevented treatment-induced angiogenesis and hypoxia, promoted CD8+ T cell activation and mitochondrial fitness, and boosted immune-stimulatory myeloid phenotypes, while decreasing infiltration of suppressive, VEGF-expressing myeloid cells.

Contributed by Katherine Turner

ABSTRACT: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown limited efficacy against solid tumors, which often reside in highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments (TMEs). TMEs can be highly abundant in vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF), which contributes to immunosuppression and abnormal tumor vasculature. Here, we found that CAR T cells engineered to secrete an anti-VEGF single-chain variable fragment (CAR-_VEGF T cells) achieved superior antitumor efficacy against multiple in vivo models of ovarian cancer and glioma, outperforming conventional CAR T cells with and without combination anti-VEGF antibody therapy. Microscopy, flow cytometry, and transcriptomic analyses revealed that armoring the CAR T cells with anti-VEGF single-chain variable fragments enhanced their activation and mitochondrial fitness and enriched immune-stimulatory signatures among endogenous immune cells in the tumor-bearing brain. Moreover, CAR-_VEGF T cells circumvented multiple detrimental effects associated with on-target CAR T cell therapy, including infiltration of suppressive myeloid cells, exaggerated vasculature abnormalities, and hypoxia. Together, our results provide rationale for the clinical translation of CAR-_VEGF T cells as a safe and potent therapy for solid tumors characterized by elevated VEGF.

Author Info: (1) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Ge

Author Info: (1) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (2) Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (3) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (4) Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan. (5) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (6) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (7) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (8) Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (9) Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (10) Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (11) Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (12) Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (13) Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (14) Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. (15) Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan. (16) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

TOX drives CD4+ TH1 effector function, antitumor immunity and autoimmune pathology Featured  

Naizir et al. investigated the role of TOX in CD4+ T cells and found that it was critical for CD4+ type 1 helper T (TH1) cell differentiation, driving cells out of a stem-like state and towards an IFNγ-producing TH1 phenotype in response to TCR stimulation. While TOX mediated a core epigenetic program in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, it also drove distinct programs with opposing functions. Unlike in CD8+ T cells, TOX expression in CD4+ T cells was associated with increased cytotoxicity, antitumor immunity, and responses to immunotherapy, as well as with pathogenic responses in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in mice

Naizir et al. investigated the role of TOX in CD4+ T cells and found that it was critical for CD4+ type 1 helper T (TH1) cell differentiation, driving cells out of a stem-like state and towards an IFNγ-producing TH1 phenotype in response to TCR stimulation. While TOX mediated a core epigenetic program in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, it also drove distinct programs with opposing functions. Unlike in CD8+ T cells, TOX expression in CD4+ T cells was associated with increased cytotoxicity, antitumor immunity, and responses to immunotherapy, as well as with pathogenic responses in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in mice

ABSTRACT: TOX is a nuclear factor critical for thymic development of CD4(+) thymocytes, natural killer and innate lymphoid cells. In post-thymic antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells, TOX is highly expressed in settings of chronic antigen encounter such as cancer and chronic infection and required for the persistence of exhausted CD8(+) T cells. The role of TOX in CD4(+) T cells is less clear. Here, we show that TOX is critical for CD4(+) type 1 helper T (T(H)1) cell differentiation. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies show that TOX induces T(H)1 cell-associated molecular programs that drive T(H)1 cell-like phenotypes and interferon-_ production. TOX expression in CD4(+) T cells from individuals with cancer was associated with increased cytotoxicity, antitumor immunity and improved responses to immunotherapy, as well as pathogenic responses in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in mice and humans. Thus, TOX has opposing functions in CD4(+) versus CD8(+) T cells: while TOX is associated with CD8(+) T cell exhaustion and generally with poor responsiveness to immunotherapy, in CD4(+) T cells TOX drives T(H)1 cell fate commitment and is associated with antitumor immunity and pathogenic autoimmune responses.

Author Info: (1) Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA. naizirb@sloankettering.edu. Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,

Author Info: (1) Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA. naizirb@sloankettering.edu. Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. naizirb@sloankettering.edu. (2) Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA. (3) Department of Systems and Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Applied Bioinformatics Core, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (4) Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (5) Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. (6) Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA. Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA. (7) Applied Bioinformatics Core, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. (8) Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA. schietia@mskcc.org. Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. schietia@mskcc.org. Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA. schietia@mskcc.org.

Nous-209 neoantigen vaccine for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome carriers: a phase 1b/2 trial Spotlight 

D’Alise and Willis et al. presented results from a phase 1b/2 single-arm trial of 45 Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers treated with Nous-209 – an IM, heterologous, prime/boost, virus-based vaccine encoding 209 frameshift peptides (FSPs) shared across neoplasms with microsatellite instability (MSI). Potent/durable vaccine-induced FSP-specific IFNγ-producing CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses were observed in all 37 evaluable participants. Peptide–HLA predictions helped identify >100 FSPs, which were immunogenic in vitro and detected in datasets of LS MSI-high colorectal pre-cancers/cancers. The vaccine was safe, and no participants had advanced adenomas or CRC at the end of the study.

Contributed by Paula Hochman

D’Alise and Willis et al. presented results from a phase 1b/2 single-arm trial of 45 Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers treated with Nous-209 – an IM, heterologous, prime/boost, virus-based vaccine encoding 209 frameshift peptides (FSPs) shared across neoplasms with microsatellite instability (MSI). Potent/durable vaccine-induced FSP-specific IFNγ-producing CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses were observed in all 37 evaluable participants. Peptide–HLA predictions helped identify >100 FSPs, which were immunogenic in vitro and detected in datasets of LS MSI-high colorectal pre-cancers/cancers. The vaccine was safe, and no participants had advanced adenomas or CRC at the end of the study.

Contributed by Paula Hochman

ABSTRACT: Cancer interception is a preventative approach aiming to reduce cancer incidence by targeting precancers and early-stage cancers. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a prevalent hereditary cancer syndrome affecting ~1 in 300 individuals, with an overall lifetime cancer risk as high as 80%. LS is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes, leading to microsatellite instability (MSI) and accumulation of shared mutations. When these occur in coding regions, they generate frameshift peptides (FSPs). Nous-209 is a neoantigen-directed immunotherapy based on a heterologous prime boost using great ape adenovirus and modified vaccinia virus Ankara encoding 209 FSPs shared across MSI neoplasms. We present the results from cohort 1 of a phase 1b/2 single-arm trial of Nous-209 for cancer interception in LS carriers (n = 45). Safety and immunogenicity were coprimary endpoints. Safety was assessed in 45 participants. Vaccination was safe with no intervention-related serious adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were injection-site reactions (any grade in 91% of participants after prime and 76% after boost with no grade 3) and fatigue (any grade in 80% after prime and 53% after boost with 4% grade 3 after prime or after boost). Neoantigen-specific immune responses were observed after vaccination in 100% of evaluable participants (n = 37), with induction of potent T cell immunity (mean response at peak of ~1,100 interferon-γ spot-forming cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells). The immune response was durable and detectable at 1 year in 85% of participants. Both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were induced, recognizing multiple FSPs. Peptide-human leukocyte antigen predictions allowed the identification of >100 immunogenic FSPs with demonstration of cytotoxic activity in vitro. Immunogenic FSPs were found in independent datasets of LS MSI colorectal precancers and cancers. These results highlight Nous-209 ability to efficiently stimulate immunity against neoantigens in LS, supporting its development for cancer interception (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05078866 ).

Author Info: (1) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (2) Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (3) Department of Clinical C

Author Info: (1) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (2) Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (3) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (4) Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. (5) University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, USA. (6) City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA. (7) Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (8) University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, USA. (9) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (10) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (11) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (12) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (13) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (14) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (15) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. (16) Nouscom AG, Basel, Switzerland. (17) Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (18) Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (19) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (20) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (21) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (22) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (23) Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. (24) Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. (25) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (26) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. (27) Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. (28) Nouscom SRL, Rome, Italy. e.scarselli@nouscom.com. (29) Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. EVilar@mdanderson.org.

NR2F6 deletion revives CAR-T cell function and induces antigen-agnostic immune memory in solid tumors Spotlight 

Dominik and Victoria et al. identified NR2F6 as a T cell-intrinsic metabolic checkpoint for CAR T cells in solid tumors. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of NR2F6 sustained a TCF1+ progenitor exhausted state and maintained metabolic fitness during chronic antigen stimulation. NR2F6 deletion in CAR T cells increased cytotoxicity, cytokine production, resistance to functional exhaustion, and tumor control in immunocompetent Panc02-EpCAM tumor models. DC-mediated cross-priming with epitope spreading and activation of endogenous immunity generated durable protection against CAR antigen-positive and -negative tumor rechallenge.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

Dominik and Victoria et al. identified NR2F6 as a T cell-intrinsic metabolic checkpoint for CAR T cells in solid tumors. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of NR2F6 sustained a TCF1+ progenitor exhausted state and maintained metabolic fitness during chronic antigen stimulation. NR2F6 deletion in CAR T cells increased cytotoxicity, cytokine production, resistance to functional exhaustion, and tumor control in immunocompetent Panc02-EpCAM tumor models. DC-mediated cross-priming with epitope spreading and activation of endogenous immunity generated durable protection against CAR antigen-positive and -negative tumor rechallenge.

Contributed by Shishir Pant

ABSTRACT: CAR-T cell therapy is effective in hematologic malignancies but remains challenging in solid tumors owing to antigen heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment-induced exhaustion. Here, gene editing of the nuclear receptor NR2F6 restores CAR-T cell functionality, sustaining a TCF1⁺ progenitor-exhausted phenotype, enhancing metabolic fitness, and preserving cytotoxic potency under chronic antigen exposure. In immunocompetent models, Nr2f6-deficient CAR-T cells suppress solid tumor growth and induce robust, polyclonal host antitumor responses that persist after CAR-T clearance, as demonstrated by tumor re-challenge protection. Although infused CAR-T cells disappear within 2 weeks, durable tumor control coincides with epitope spreading and secondary immune responses, likely via dendritic cell reactivation. Protection against antigen-negative tumors and transferable immunity reveal a dual mode of direct cytotoxicity followed by durable immune reprogramming. This broadened host immunity may offset immune escape driven by antigen heterogeneity or loss, establishing NR2F6 inhibition as a promising CAR-T engineering strategy for durable, antigen-agnostic solid-tumor immunotherapy.

Author Info: (1) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (2) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. victoria

Author Info: (1) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (2) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. victoria.klepsch@i-med.ac.at. (3) Biocenter, Institute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (4) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (5) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (6) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (7) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (8) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Department of Internal Medicine V, Haematology & Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck and Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (9) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (10) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (11) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Institute of Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. (12) Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Innsbruck, Austria. Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (13) Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (14) Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (15) Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Innsbruck, Austria. Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (16) Biocenter, Institute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (17) Department of Internal Medicine V, Haematology & Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck and Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (18) Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Klinikum der UniversitŠt MŸnchen, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium, a partnership between LMU Hospital and the DKFZ, Munich, Germany. (19) Biocenter, Institute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (20) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (21) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (22) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (23) Department of Internal Medicine V, Haematology & Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck and Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. (24) Institute for Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. gottfried.baier@i-med.ac.at.

Erythrocyte-anti-PD1 conjugates in persons with advanced solid tumors resistant to anti-PD1/PDL1: preclinical characterization and results of a phase 1 trial Spotlight 

Nie, Liu, Yao, et al. developed an erythrocyte–antibody conjugate in which anti-PD-1 antibodies were covalently linked to erythrocyte membranes (αPD1-Ery). These cellular-Ab conjugates accumulated in spleens, where they expanded effector T cells and reduced immunosuppressive myeloid cells, leading to reduced tumor growth in mouse models. In a first-in-human phase I clinical trial, 14 patients with advanced cancers who were resistant to anti-PD-1/L1 were treated at 2 dose levels, which were well tolerated and reduced circulating immunosuppressive myeloid cells. The ORR was 42.9%, with 1 CR and 5 PRs, and the DCR was 78.6%.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

Nie, Liu, Yao, et al. developed an erythrocyte–antibody conjugate in which anti-PD-1 antibodies were covalently linked to erythrocyte membranes (αPD1-Ery). These cellular-Ab conjugates accumulated in spleens, where they expanded effector T cells and reduced immunosuppressive myeloid cells, leading to reduced tumor growth in mouse models. In a first-in-human phase I clinical trial, 14 patients with advanced cancers who were resistant to anti-PD-1/L1 were treated at 2 dose levels, which were well tolerated and reduced circulating immunosuppressive myeloid cells. The ORR was 42.9%, with 1 CR and 5 PRs, and the DCR was 78.6%.

Contributed by Lauren Hitchings

ABSTRACT: Despite the clinical success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy, most persons do not benefit because of inadequate efficacy, primary or acquired resistance and/or immune-related toxicities. Here we developed an erythrocyte-antibody conjugate in which anti-PD1 antibodies are covalently linked to erythrocyte membranes (αPD1-Ery). Unlike conventional antibodies, αPD1-Ery accumulates in the spleen, where it remodels the immune landscape by expanding effector T cells and reducing immunosuppressive myeloid cells. These changes reprogram the tumor microenvironment and suppress tumor growth in syngeneic mouse models. We conducted a first-in-human, phase 1 clinical trial of αPD1-Ery monotherapy in persons with advanced cancers resistant to prior anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy ( NCT06026605 ). The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity. A total of 14 participants were enrolled, with 7 receiving 2 × 1011 cells and 7 receiving 3 × 1011 cells. Repeated administration resulted in no dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related adverse events of grade >3. The objective response rate was 42.9%, including 1 complete response and 5 partial responses; disease control rate was 78.6%. Notably, αPD1-Ery rapidly reduced circulating immunosuppressive myeloid cells, consistent with preclinical observations. The study met its prespecified primary and secondary endpoints. These findings support spleen-targeted PD1 blockade by erythrocyte-antibody conjugates as a potential strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

Author Info: (1) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science

Author Info: (1) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China. (2) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China. (3) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China. (4) The Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. (5) School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China. (6) Westlake Therapeutics, Hangzhou, China. (7) Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. yxfeng@zju.edu.cn. Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. yxfeng@zju.edu.cn. (8) The Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. liangtingbo@zju.edu.cn. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. liangtingbo@zju.edu.cn. (9) Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China. yangliu@hmc.edu.cn. (10) Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. gaoxiaofei@westlake.edu.cn. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China. gaoxiaofei@westlake.edu.cn. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China. gaoxiaofei@westlake.edu.cn. Research Center for Industries of the Future and School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China. gaoxiaofei@westlake.edu.cn.

Engineered CCR7 overexpression enhances nodal CAR-T cell homing and cytotoxicity toward B cell lymphoma Spotlight 

Finding that CCR7 was downregulated during CAR T manufacturing, Zschummel et al. generated CAR T cells with CCR7 overexpression (CAR.CCR7). Compared to CAR-T, CAR.CCR7-T had increased CCL19-mediated migration in vitro, and demonstrated LN accumulation and lymphoma depletion in a syngeneic mouse model. CAR.CCR7-T had superior cytotoxicity in vitro compared to standard CAR-T, especially at low E:T, but not due to CAR or Th1 cytokine expression, or the ligand CCL19. CAR.CCR7-T cells were larger, had increased cytoskeletal regulatory gene expression, recruited CCR7 to the immune synapse, and showed early ZAP70 phosphorylation and degranulation.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

Finding that CCR7 was downregulated during CAR T manufacturing, Zschummel et al. generated CAR T cells with CCR7 overexpression (CAR.CCR7). Compared to CAR-T, CAR.CCR7-T had increased CCL19-mediated migration in vitro, and demonstrated LN accumulation and lymphoma depletion in a syngeneic mouse model. CAR.CCR7-T had superior cytotoxicity in vitro compared to standard CAR-T, especially at low E:T, but not due to CAR or Th1 cytokine expression, or the ligand CCL19. CAR.CCR7-T cells were larger, had increased cytoskeletal regulatory gene expression, recruited CCR7 to the immune synapse, and showed early ZAP70 phosphorylation and degranulation.

Contributed by Alex Najibi

ABSTRACT: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy demonstrated remarkable efficacy against hematological malignancies. However, B cell malignancies with lymph node (LN) involvement frequently remain resistant. Here, we show that CAR T cells downregulated the chemokine receptor CCR7, crucial for nodal homing, during manufacturing. Consequently, in vitro migration toward the respective chemokines and in vivo migration to LNs was severely impaired. To improve nodal CAR T-cell trafficking, we engineered anti-CXCR5 CAR T cells, targeting mature lymphoma, with stable CCR7 expression (CAR.CCR7). CCR7 engineering of human and mouse CAR T cells restored migratory capacity and LN homing. Additionally, we observed enhanced CAR-mediated killing in CCR7-engineered anti-CXCR5 and anti-CD19-CARs alike, a process that was independent of increased cytokine secretion. Mechanistically, CCR7 overexpression was associated with an altered expression of genes involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement and faster killing kinetics. CCR7 accumulated in mature CAR synapses, supporting the costimulatory role of CCR7 within immunological synapses. Therapeutically, improved LN-recruitment and enhanced killing of CAR.CCR7 T cells improved lymphoma eradication in mice.

Author Info: (1) Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown, Massachusetts United States. ROR: https://ror.org/002pd6e78 (2) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin, Berlin Germany. R

Author Info: (1) Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown, Massachusetts United States. ROR: https://ror.org/002pd6e78 (2) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin, Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03 (3) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03 (4) Max DelbrŸck Center Berlin, Berlin Germany. (5) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03 (6) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03 (7) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. (8) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. (9) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. (10) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. (11) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03 (12) Max DelbrŸck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany. ROR: https://ror.org/04p5ggc03

Close Modal

Small change for you. Big change for us!

This Thanksgiving season, show your support for cancer research by donating your change.

In less than a minute, link your credit card with our partner RoundUp App.

Every purchase you make with that card will be rounded up and the change will be donated to ACIR.

All transactions are securely made through Stripe.